View more about The Amazing Spider-Man reviews
You did it again!
Barbara 2022-03-15 09:01:01
Just after watching the Australian premiere at Zero Point, I realized that the new Spider-Man is neither a prequel nor a sequel, but a remake... But, as a patriotic education hero film, the old beauty you did it again! Although I still talk about how Peter became Spider-Man, the new version of the story is richer and closer to the real world. At least this time, the spider silk was sprayed from a self-made device (so it can be damaged later. I have never known spider silk before. How to get out of the wrist). There are also improvements: the spider suit is more realistic, the monsters in the first battle are cooler, and the heroine is more cute (Emma Stone is obviously more pleasing to Kirsten Dunst). Although there were some criticisms about the hero (it feels like James Franco was acting), the truth is The proof is good, at least they are more like 17-year-old high school students. The plot is compact, two and a half hours do not feel long, and the coexistence of spit and exclamation points; the 3D effect is quite satisfactory, but the last scene of spraying spider silk at the audience does not seem to achieve the effect...
Extended Reading
-
The Lizard: Poor Peter Parker. No father. No mother. No uncle. You're all alone.
George Stacy: He's not alone.
[Stacy fires at the Lizard]
-
Gwen Stacy: Sorry, Dad. I can't, um, have cocoa right now, because I'm work... I'm doing this, um... I have, uh... cramps. I feel kinda pukey and... just emotional. I keep crying. It's brutal. You don't want to know.
Related Articles
-
The Amazing Spider-Man "Washington Post": Garfield, still capable of Spider-Man
-
The Amazing Spider-Man "The New Yorker": The villain's dullness is disappointing
-
The Amazing Spider-Man "Wall Street Reporter": Emma Stone's eyes are not as empty as Dunst
-
The Amazing Spider-Man "Daily News": Insufficient innovation scenes are old-fashioned
-
The Amazing Spider-Man "Film, com": Superhero overconsumption