So, how did the Hunger Games achieve this little hope? For my friends and I who have not read the original work, we can only infer from what the current movie expresses:
1. Rules of the game:
Choose 2 in each district, a total of 24, and finally kill each other until only one exists, only Some 1 will become very rich. The selection rules are divided into voluntary and lottery.
If you receive government subsidies, your name will appear on the candidate list repeatedly, that is, the more government subsidies you receive, the greater the probability of being selected. (If you don’t receive the subsidy from beginning to end, will you not be selected at all? The film did not explain it, I hope the original party will answer)
2. Where is the hope of the rules:
The premise we set is that when life becomes difficult and cannot survive Only then will there be resistance and change. Then, in the world set in the play, people who have no problems with their lives have a small chance of being selected (maybe they won't be selected at all), but there is nothing wrong with their lives, so there is no need to resist and change. For those people whose lives are very difficult, zf provides a guarantee for them to live. Of course, the price of "fairness" is that they must have the opportunity to participate in this game.
The so-called fairness is that although only one of 24 people can survive each time, when the number of candidates in the district is large, the chance of being selected is relatively small. Even if "unfortunately" is selected, then you still have a chance to become rich. And my extra guess is that after becoming rich, your family’s life is also secured, and the chances of other people in your family being selected will become very small (or 0).
And how to guarantee a large number of candidates? My guess is: in the evil xx society in the West, society does not allow common prosperity!!!
Third, what is the president's will:
In the play, we see the practice of districts 1,2. Someone in their district wants to participate in this game deliberately. Some may be so instinct, like killing, like competition, another part, may be unable to live, without the skills to live, or zf does not give the opportunity to live and work, then make a living with subsidies, anyway, do well to participate in The preparation for the game, then one more year will be more than one year. It is equivalent to a professional participant, who survives by relying on this game. "Correspondingly", there have been more winners in Districts 1 and 2 over the years.
Our guess is that after the formation of such a climate in Districts 1, 2, those who may resist the revolution will have a way to relieve them, and they will not get tired of it, they will concentrate on participating in the game and reduce the chance of revolution and war.
The reason why the “corresponding” needs to be cited is that after watching the movie, you know that the winner of the game is not simply based on the hard power of the players. The competition will be guided by various forces behind the scenes (the so-called The unspoken rules of ah, but this unspoken rule does not have to sacrifice the player's own hue). Therefore, this "correspondence" does not mean that they increase their chances of winning because they concentrate on improving their combat skills (or looks and body) in Zones 1 and 2. It is more the result that the rule makers hope.
Therefore, we infer that the president's so-called "a little bit of hope" is here. We hope that all districts will be the same as districts 1 and 2, and that people who may become rebellious forces will be guided in another way. (When you see this, is your first reaction is that the people in District 1, 2 are so smart~~ And I think in the real society, this level of "smart people" affects the development of society the most =.=)
Four. Why did it almost fail this time:
Since the game can be "controlled", why did it fail. We discussed that there are three forces behind the game: the president (everyone knows what it represents), sponsors (everyone knows what it represents...), and the public opinion of the masses (everyone knows what it represents!!!)
Putting aside the public opinion for the time being, the relationship between the president and the sponsor is more delicate.
In the West (the evil society), the president cannot completely control the will of the sponsor, but the president will be the server of the sponsor's will. The president hopes to control society through games, but in addition to this, sponsors may also want to be entertained (I think sponsors of this IQ level can really only say euphemistically, they are definitely not the one who started the business. And the ones that can operate up to the sponsor level should still be quite powerful. In fact, this part of the reason is that I can make up for it myself), or improve the benefits I obtain (I thought that the supply of materials would be brought with them, such as those provided by the xx group. Yes, but no, so this one can be considered to be made up by my brain).
In the process of the game, the president must not directly control (the people absolutely do not accept the control of "No matter what you xxx, anyway, I xx" this mode of control, many miles away is not a human), and must be assisted by the producer controlling the game development behind the scenes (For example, in this year's new game, in addition to adding xx props and monsters, we also added a new xxx system, allowing you to experience a more refreshing thrill of death).
But sponsors, as an independent party (must be the source of funding for the show), can directly influence the game by providing props (the biggest bug in all games, everyone knows). Although sponsors hope to stabilize society through the president and continue to increase their income and status, in the tripartite relationship, sponsors must always behave in line with the public opinion of the masses in order to prevent the masses from conflicting with them (after all The president is just their spokesperson. If this guy doesn't work, he will stand up from the perspective of the masses and condemn him together. When it's over, just choose a new one, a hard-fought and run-down soldier). Therefore, we can see that if the producer's setting or someone's own performance becomes the focus of the crowd, then the sponsor will provide sponsorship in line with the taste of the masses and draw the relationship between themselves and the masses. At the same time, if through some other relationships (such as the "communication" of the instructor... I hope that the instructor will not sacrifice hue for this... but why not... Don't you think this movie shows less muscle...), The sponsors themselves want to sponsor, and the producer must not dare to defy, and the president can't order it. However, the president has everything to do with every day, and he can’t always pay attention to changes. If he doesn’t pay attention, the sponsor may be negligent. And there are so many sponsors, the president can't pay attention to the review one by one, hey, poor mentor "=Pure your own brain, don't blame a certain bureau if you haven't seen this plot).
Finally, the public opinion of the masses is that in all societies, the first two forces neither pay attention to it nor ignore it. The subtlety is that "water can carry and overturn the boat", everyone knows.
So when the producer first gave the heroine a high score, the president began to worry about what to do if he couldn't do as he wanted. So I scolded the producer at the beginning. However, after adding the "work" of the mentor (hey, poor mentor, why is he so handsome at a young age), the sponsor also began to provide a little service for the heroine. Later, due to the riots in District 11 (to be honest, this riot was only attributed to the death of a little girl, I thought it was a bit far-fetched, because this game kills people every year. I didn’t think about the reason for this riot, but This article only discusses games, don't care about it), plus the "work" of the mentor and the producer (the mentor, a competent mentor, the producers of the world are generally black... It's purely for your own brains, don't mind. .), the producer had no choice but to change from being biased towards female protagonists to being a strong female protagonist, and even the rules changed accordingly. In fact, to put it bluntly, it is because of the influence of the masses of public opinion that the game was forced to guide the game. In the end, the victory of the heroine was also due to the pressure of public opinion, and the heroine had to win in the way of the heroine.
Therefore, although in the end, it seemed that the public opinion was overjoyed, but the president still believed that the producer had not done a good job, so the producer was finally replaced cruelly. (But I think the most important thing is the riots in District 11, and the setting of the story should be due to the heroine factor, which instigated the riots in District 11, but according to the previous analysis, I think the direct connection is too far-fetched. So 11 How can the district riots make sense?)
Therefore, the president thinks this game almost failed. (But every year, it is District 1,2, don’t you think it’s too much, Uncle President?)
5. Other:
I personally think that the heroine of the movie is a very clever girl, and the movie shows her many times Observe the situation of others. And she also knows the rules very well and knows how to use them. In the performance of this movie, it seems to be saying that you should not be too upright to be a human being. Occasionally, you still have to use the rules and follow the rules, and survival is the kingly way. However, the theme of the general movie should be to praise those who have firm beliefs and will not yield in the face of social pressure, even if they yield, it is for the great sacrifice of others. So, I don’t know if I think too much or what, the personality traits of this movie heroine, why is it not so pure. . . (It seems that the second male is a little purer...)
The story setting of this movie can make me add a lot of things to my brain. The irony of the powerful makes me feel like "Let the Bullets Fly" back then. I hope that the original party will see if the analysis is correct, or say I watched this. The film framed another novel=. =
View more about The Hunger Games reviews
