The plot is a young bastard who committed evil acts, was put in jail, and later received psychological reform, was "cured" and released early, and then went to 3/4 of the movie, homeless, and once again encountered the previous bullying Homeless man. So far, there is no major problem with the plot, and there are still some highlights in the expression method, and the soundtrack is good. It seems to be a regular plot to discuss juvenile crime and salvation. But the latter was shocking, adding a dark ending to the critical political struggle. If you want to criticize the dirty of politics, you don't need to spend so much pen and ink on the unrelated plot, but the political struggle begins at 3/4 of the movie and ends quickly, which is superfluous and makes people incomprehensible.
The protagonist’s performance was even worse, especially when the protagonist was imprisoned for two years, tied to a chair for psychological modification, homelessness, attempted suicide, and treatment for serious injuries. After multiple blows, the protagonist remained relaxed and happy, as if nothing had happened. It happened. I don’t know if the director and actor’s brains are flooded.
This is the ban, let people insist on watching the movie. The charisma of the ban can be referred to in the first half of the year that Chinese people went to Hong Kong to watch those movies, so skip it here. Clockwork oranges do not need to be looked at, and even less for those under eighteen. Paternalism is not necessarily wrong. However, as adults, we do not need others to think and judge for us, and imprisoned thoughts will not be creative. You know the effect of the ban, the more people ban it, the more people want to watch it, just as those who went to Hong Kong to watch that movie claimed "I just want to prove that I am free".
View more about A Clockwork Orange reviews
