The topic was the chat history in the group. The classmate named "Strong Attack" said that she was a little dissatisfied with the end of the movie. We discussed why, and the answer was that she was not satisfied with the victory.
I am actually very dissatisfied with this, but the reason for dissatisfaction is not only the ending, but the setting of the storm.
I feel that this is clearly a movie with the main theme, but it is easy to teach children badly. I believe that there are many people who are not satisfied with the victory. This is a living evil.
The first time I heard about this movie, I heard it from a girl with a brain disabled, and during that period I did see a lot of her rebellious behavior. I believe she must be in the same fine line as Brad Pitt in the movie. The character that comes out has considerable resonance.
This is exactly what I don't want to see.
First of all, this movie is about the individual, not the society.
There are many excellent anti-social movies, "V for Vendetta" is one of the best, and that one is well shot. But if Brad Pitt in "Fight Club" wins, will this movie be another "V"? Of course not, because the society in "Boke" is far from the society in "V", and "Boke" basically doesn't talk about society, but about individuals.
Speaking of individuals, I want to go a little further.
First, let me talk about the free will that the West emphasizes.
I chatted with my daughter-in-law that day and talked about human consciousness. Her years of cognitive science study finally allowed her to cultivate into a technical house in this area, and reached an agreement with me: consciousness is algorithm plus data.
Our original words at the time were: Human consciousness is composed of human physiological structure plus personal experience and some non-replicable randomness.
After this deconstruction, we will find that the so-called free will cannot find an exact carrier or source, and human consciousness does not contain any soul or anything unique to other people. In this way, the so-called independent choice is actually the result of a series of factors.
It feels a bit fatalistic, but thorough fatalism is as unfalsifiable as thorough subjective idealism, and it will be chopped off by a certain razor.
Uh, far away.
Going back to the choice, I was more impressed with the choice that was the first day Harry Potter entered Hogwarts. When he chose the academy, the conversation with the hat was also mentioned in the second part.
Hat thinks that his aptitude is very suitable for Slytherin, but Harry said to Hat himself that he chose Gryffindor, and some people later emphasized that "our choice is the most important."
But why did he choose this way?
Because Dad is from that college, because Slytherin is dark, because acquaintances are from that college, because Gryffindor wants a little bit of sunshine, etc.
All these reasons added together, it became the reason for his choice, and Harry's choice was only a combined result.
It's not a mysterious reason like the depths of the soul.
Okay, back to the movie:
Brad Pitt was finally defeated, the main melody sounded, and the protagonist defeated his own madness.
But what if this madness is not so powerful?
What if it is only a guy who has ideas and personality, but is not so harmful?
Then there is no reason for the protagonist to oppose Brad Pitt, and the movie becomes an encouragement.
The movie strives to exaggerate the harm of the fine score result, and then knocks down that result to highlight this theme, emphasizing the face up to oneself, but I think that facing up to oneself should not be expressed in this form.
The lines in the movie are "you're not your job, you're not how much money you have in the bank, you're not the car you drive, you're not the contents of your wallet, you're not your fucking khakis, you are the all-singing, all dance crap of the world."
With Brad's handsome face swaying on the screen, this sentence is like an inception, and it penetrates many people's hearts...
But, I want to say, you are made up of those things.
He can separate "you" from your social relationships, which makes you very happy, because there are so many social relationships that you already hate.
However, just like the free will I mentioned earlier, I can continue to peel away "you", your physiological structure, your level of consciousness, your independent choice, and you will find that there is nothing left after you peel it off. You" don't even have scum left.
"When you are forced by this society, it is better to lie down and enjoy."
This is a very Ah Q's point of view, but it is very dangerous. Just when I was about to enjoy it, I discovered that the social organs are two meters long, and they will always pierce through the digestive system and stick out of the mouth.
So, enjoyment is too negative.
In this movie, people who are socially strong, turn their heads and take a sip of heroin, and become crazier than society. It seems that they are opposing a strong society. But it's also a fake, that the big breasted man, getting a headshot is the result, the only result of all of them continuing to do it.
Therefore, I don't think the previous paragraph in English is correct.
So, what should we do when we are forced by society?
How would I know...
[End]
PS: I suddenly found that my beloved movie "The Mechanic" basically moved the setting of this movie, I was sad...
View more about Fight Club reviews
