Basically, there is an obvious celestial world separated from Hollywood blockbusters, and then the gimmicky things with dazzling CG production and bright casts are more or less painful. Deeply rendered by Taoist culture, it is hard not to think about the Jade Emperor and Queen Mother when watching movies. The gods in Norse mythology are all flat, like Thor’s power-type, their character is basically: stubborn, straight, ruthless, then to play, it is natural to design an intriguing character and a cruel and arduous character. Task. The Thor, played by Chris, has a kind of handsome and cute chivalrous tenderness, which is reflected by the infatuation of silly La Baku that mortals can't understand and Natalie's spring breeze. But in the final analysis, this is not a story about things, nor a story about people (gods). In the end, I basically couldn't tell whether the power of CG technology overwhelmed the fun of the story, or the plainness of the story itself supported the fantasy of the background. This is actually a story about a show-stopping technology artist.
It is conceivable that the huge preparatory work required to make such a film, the prop design, character modeling, and the composite layer of the blue screen background are very troublesome and troublesome to think about, so the bias of investment has led to the weak script. The story of "Thor" passes through a rainbow bridge to make the scene swish across three awesome planets. It's really a "swish to arrive". But when these celestial civil servants "swish" to the earth to have fun with mortals, the scene was unspeakable. So is the god bigger? So didn't God keep up with the times and learn the "Guide to the Survival of Modern Human Society"? So even if I don’t know anything about God, can I still speak fluent Classical English? So is God destined to like the woman he first met after he fell into the mortal world? I think the moment Thor regained the power of Thor, just like many moments in his previous life in small American towns, he silently despised mortals in his heart. But Natalie, who was blinded by him, could only bow her head lonely in every starry night, humming: "Where is the rainbow tell me". . .
One of the most tangled characters in Thor is Tolvin’s weak brother Rocky (it’s really tangled to have such a macho name). This character has his own ideas so much that it is difficult for me to figure out what he thinks. At the beginning, it was obvious that he wanted to be the king. Later, when he knew he was a different species, he said that he fell to the enemy. Then suddenly it was revealed that he was actually loyal to his original dream and wanted to be the king of the most powerful planet in the Sunshine Kingdom. Therefore, the sense of conversion of the root-seeking culture nation is very empty! He opposed everyone, but no one was killed except the leader of the alien army. Basically, he acted very benevolent. Compared with the ancient Chinese poisoning, sentiment, usurpation, and rape, the insidious index of his tricks was obviously too low. , But it was enough to compete with Thor's city government. "Thor" uses simple character contradictions to entangle the plot, focusing on launching its gorgeous and extremely gorgeous photoelectric special effects, and it has become a pseudo 3D money-raising train in the domestic market.
One of the more interesting aspects of "Thor" is that it presents the kingdom of the gods on the planet Iskar-a nearly perfect world characterized by the combination of a good natural environment on the periphery and highly-developed construction technology. The life form maintains a primitive fighting loyalty and fighting style. Here, magic is an ununderstood technology. This is actually the key to the visual beauty of film art, using complex engineering to outline the light and shadow effects that the audience understands and accepts. But the movie is not a trick. The production of the emptiness on the outside and the inside can only be a fat commercial fast food in the end.
View more about Thor reviews
