Nine out of ten shots of the king and teacher in the film are unbalanced. These shots are often accompanied by close-ups or busts of the characters. The characters are on the edge of the frame and the depth of field behind them is defocused. This is a good deal. The imaginary depth of field is emptiness and loneliness. This loneliness accounts for more than half of the inner world of the king and the teacher. The composition of the front and back of the dialogue scene between the two people is unbalanced, as if two people entered their own. In the small world, all the distracting thoughts in the world have been thrown out of the sky. The composition of other scenes is more normal, in line with the standard location arrangement. Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush and Helena Bonham Carter played really well. The three played very evenly, and none of them had a particularly high rise than the other.
This film is not as difficult as "Fighter" in terms of director, and the finished effect may not be better than "Fighter", let alone compare with "Social Network", the reason lies in the duo or multiplayer of the latter two movies. They all account for a very high proportion, the interaction between actors is extremely strong, and the dialogue in "The King" is slow, and most of them are the easiest way to deal with "one person, one mirror, one sentence". As an audience who cares very much about the continuity of the picture, I almost can't bear the editing of this film. When the face and the back are played back, the actor's face and movements will change, and the production is very imprecise. Lower the standard a bit, "emotion first, continuity second" is also good, but a closer look, the layout of the script is very deliberate, because of the eagerness to explain the plot and ignore the rationality, especially the beginning of the film 20 Within minutes, this problem was particularly obvious. As for the other parts of the movie, there is nothing to say. In a word, it is difficult to make the audience feel emotional. Maybe it will be a little uplifting when you watch it, but the evaluation after watching it is definitely not high. One more thing, even if the Directors’ Guild Award is not given to Fincher, it should not be given to Hopper. No matter who won't win the Oscar Award, Hopper must be shouldn't win.
(The PS Oscar results have just been announced. "The King" beats "Social" to get the two best. Very good, Oscar. You have a good interpretation of the meaning of the word "shame". On the difficulty of the director and the effect of the film, "Social "" is more than an order of magnitude higher than "The King", and the difficulty of directing "The King" is not even as difficult as that of "Fighter", "Inception" and "Black Swan." Can’t be a mother-in-law. Very good. February 28)
View more about The King's Speech reviews
