In the original book, even if Grindelwald was a famous dark wizard before, he was probably notorious before Voldemort, but when Voldemort finally asked about the whereabouts of his old wand, he chose not to say it. Maybe he At that time, it was already clear in his heart that even if he didn't say it, Voldemort could finally find the old wand, but he chose to leave the world with the last bit of hope in his way, which also showed that even a bad person, as long as he does not lose his humanity, there is always repentance in his heart. Harmonious side. But in the movie, Grindelwald sold Dumbledore directly. Perhaps I can understand that due to the limited space of the film, the director cannot explain the various kinds of interactions between Dumbledore and Grindelwald. Only in this way can I explain the location of the old magic wand more reasonably, but the director can fully understand. Take less shots for half of the shots, for a taller image of Grindelwald.
In any case, I shouldn’t complain. The age of Harry Potter is less than a year, and the ten-year time is about to reach its end. In the past, I can look forward to new books and movies every year. After the end of the book a year ago, there were only movies left, and when there was only the last one, apart from cherishing every minute and every second that accompanied the magical world, nothing else was important.
View more about Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 reviews
