"History" VS "herstory", Reivew on Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark

Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark

In 2010, when I watched the 1936 film that was shot by Spielberg in 1981, I was exploring mysterious objects that were unknown to me 3,000 years ago. In such a long historical span, I really can’t say anything~ As an "archaeologist" (to a certain extent, I can call myself that, after all, I am a loyal supporter of post-process archaeology). It’s too uncomfortable to not look at this. ...The image of women in the play is too useless. At first, I thought it was a ruthless character. In the end, all kinds of foreign powers worked in it. This has to make people think that history is really "history" and can never become "herstory", feminist Domineering historians, let’s face reality. In addition, Indy wears glasses and looks like a gentle archeologist. Wielding a whip, it’s too heavy. Well of the Souls, there are real snakes, or else. I can only say that the special effects are also great~Finally, I have reservations about this kind of behavior of grabbing (or beautifying it as a rescue) things for yourself~

View more about Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark reviews

Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark pictures