Wang also looked at the clip beforehand, and I and Xiao Chong were both smeared. I just think the name of the movie is very interesting, "How to train your dragon" (How to train your dragon), "Tame", "your", and the one that is overwhelmingly overwhelming, the one being driven away is actually a huge dragon. I secretly said, fortunately, it is singular, only one, ten or twenty, which is probably impossible. The general environment in the movie is exactly the opposite of this. People succumb to the last position in the food chain and cannot match the dragons who came to looting. Dragons also have difficulties. They grab prey and fly to the cave to feed the giant old man. Long Jing.
This person is not waiting for idlers, but sturdy Vikings. Their homes have been destroyed by dragons again and again, but they are also very experienced. It seems that the big head confessed to the children, and led his army to search for the dragon's lair. "Maybe" will come back. "Maybe" have used the probability of winning. They train young people in a more planned way so that they can deal with dragon criminals with progressive firepower like gladiators. The gift of adulthood is a dragon slaying game. The Vikings were chased and looted from the very beginning, so even if they had a fierce face, thick red hair, covered in animal skins, and a beast hat on their heads, their instincts to counterattack were understandable, but the method was open to questioning. Huanglong is still living peacefully. This is also the focus of contradictions in the movie.
There are quite a few animation productions, and they like to praise some deviant heroes. As an absolute minority, they sometimes coincide with the majority in their ideas. The difference is limited to the form, and some are different inside and outside, like in "Dragon Trainer" Hiccup. When the girl he admired asked him how he could ignore everyone for his dragon pet, his answer was actually affirmative. In his own words, for three hundred years, he could not slay a dragon like this. Vikings too. His reason is based on his understanding of dragons. He also saw fear in their eyes. He knew that they also had weaknesses, they would tick their necks, they would laugh silly, and they had their own principles and levels. As the saying goes, "Because you understand, so be merciful," Sicapneng said to the dragon, everything we know about you guys is wrong, the dragons he played against would almost all retreat gently and bow their heads under his first concession.
The break of this peace situation was ultimately due to people. The most terrifying thing is that it is not the dragon that spit out fire and destroys the homeland, but it is the person who has rich combat experience but does not understand the enemy, and only hopes to counter violence and solve problems with one stick. They must veto Sikapu's right to speak, they must take the initiative to fight, and they will never wake up if they don't fight to death, and they don't realize that it is likely that their judgment has been wrong. In the animation "Horton Hear a Who" (Horton Hear a Who) adapted from Dr Seuss's book of the same name, similar leaders and animal punishments for not accepting confrontational discourse appeared. Last year's Up and earlier Wall.E, both There is no shortage of iron-blooded leaders who control the direction and constrain the overall situation. It’s very interesting that American’s animation thinking tends to lean towards the gleaming sparks, the souls that cannot withstand pressure, the flexible doves rather than the tough hawks. In reality, I think human nature is never As for Songguchi: "Everything we know is wrong about you", tolerance probably does not belong to the earth's vocabulary.
The characters in this animation remind me of Astérix, who are also so fat and bulging. I remember there is a story dedicated to the chubby Gaul against the Viking thieves. The so-called night fury dragon that won the favor of Hicarp (maybe even the majority of the audience) has no teeth in the legend. As a result, he grinned and had a round body, with a big head on top, which looked a bit like the accident in Lilo and Stitch. Little trouble is over. Another kind of guy that I call the dragon bee, is also a cheerful look. Although it has a mouth and a tongue, the expression is also cruel, unlike most "traditional dragons" with sharp edges and joints. Compared to people and dragons who are equally familiar, I personally prefer dragons.
In this actual contest between people, or the battle between great love and ethnic interests, many people and dragons are in flight. This is also the part where 3D adds points to the picture. As for whether IMAX is so important, I think it is second. Then this dark night rage, as soon as it soars into the sky like a dark horse spreading its wings, no matter the wind test, or the high and low shuttle in one go, accompanied by the magnificent soundtrack of John Powell, the moments that go through the cloud bathing abyss and speed up and down are all It seems to convey vigorous vitality to the viewers, and keep telling you that dreams without boundaries can also come true.
Cartoons probably always refuse to disappoint the children. The ending, the positive and the negative, the winning or losing, always find a short-term average point. For big observers like me, these are pure daydreams when they are put into reality. Instead, they are the most dreamlike interactions between different races. Carefree and carefree passing by the blue water of the sky makes me full of heart and hate. Fly.
http://ciyunw.blogbus.com/logs/61295303.html
View more about How to Train Your Dragon reviews
