First of all, setting aside its plot, as far as its scenes are concerned, there are really too many extra parts. These are completely showing off to a 1968 audience. Most of them are "blockbuster movies of the year" nature, which is very shocking, but Now it looks a little helpless and ridiculous-I don’t need to watch these scenes that are exhaustive and technically backward or even show off (of course it’s reasonable in 68). I can skip these parts and face it directly. I want to tell. My stuff (then this movie has no length).
The plot, I would rather it be just a story about the investigation of mysterious events in space, otherwise it will take my brains again. However, it is not an easy-to-understand story, and I don't want to bother thinking about it, so I went here to find a shortcut. After reading a lot of dazzling comments, the analysis is very thorough, with every detail. If this is a reading question, you can get full marks. I actually admire these knowledgeable and logical people, but I just don’t like this kind of linguistic analysis. I just want to hear what the director wants to say to us. Does he just want to give us a huge vision? Experience? Did he just surprise us by accident? Is he deliberately so nagging to make people think that he really has a lot of things to make people think? (Too unromantic...) The reason is sometimes very simple. Let me give you a few vivid examples to explain. Not everyone can figure out what is in chaos (it seems I am really stupid).
In addition, this soundtrack is pretty good, but it depends on whether you are in the mood to enjoy it. I just browsed this film when I was not in the mood... If you
die, please ignore this article.
View more about 2001: A Space Odyssey reviews
