Porter has a little more complicated temperament. In the first half of the book, he was ridiculed and misunderstood as Cheater, and his friend Ron's contempt was added. The book is so gloomy and dull, but in the movie, it is almost impossible to see the wave. Te was depressed and angry; the second half vaguely revealed that Potter's complicated relationship with Voldmort was far more than just the relationship between the hero and the villain. But the performance in the movie is too simple. Therefore, the cold style shown in the movie is only superficial, and the characters are still too simplistic. Maybe the director has taken care of the understanding ability of the small audience, just to challenge their courage rather than intelligence. The coldness of the book is full of words between the lines. Comparing the two, I prefer books, and I believe the children are the same.
View more about
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire reviews