According to the heroes in "The Lord of the Rings", this is the most evil thing, with great power and great temptation, and people who often contact it will become evil. It was because of his strong resistance that Frodo escorted him all the way to the Demon Realm and destroyed it.
I deeply doubt this statement. Because in the film the Lord of the Rings is not as strong as they claim.
Although the Lord of the Rings has always been the central content of film performance, it only exhibits two functions from beginning to end:
a. Longevity. People who wear it are immortal, including the hobbit Gollum (the little fairy) and Bilbo. Ring spirits don’t die even if they wear a copy of the ring. The devil Sauron can come back to life before the ring is destroyed.
b. Invisible. All three hobbits who have worn the ring have played this hand. Strange. The thing is, its maker Sauron did not use invisibility to escape when he was under siege.
In addition, the Lord of the Rings did not show other functions. Sauron did not gain the power to rule the world when he wore it. At the beginning of the film, he was beaten so that only a widow was left. The result was outnumbered and the treasure was taken away. Although the chopped finger is accidental, it also shows that the power of the Lord of the Ring itself is limited, and even the finger on it cannot be used. Protection.
King Isildur of Gondor, who won the Lord of the Rings, was quickly killed, and the next owner was also killed (the Hobbit who died at the beginning of the third part) Later, Frodo also broke his finger by Guru. This shows that the Lord of the Rings itself has no protective ability. Except for Sauron's performance at the beginning of the film, all the owners of the Lord of the Rings have no offensive ability. Sauron’s ability should be very powerful without the Lord of the Rings. It seems that the Lord of the Rings can indeed only be used for peaceful
purposes , not military functions. If a ring can be used for longevity and invisibility, there is nothing. Can war performance be considered a good thing? At least, not an evil thing?
As for temptation, I don’t think it should be necessarily connected with evil. Good things are also tempting to people. Bilbo has worn the Lord of the Rings for decades and has done nothing bad. Guru has worn it for 500 years, and the only bad thing that can be verified is that he killed his companion at the beginning. Note that when Gulu did this bad thing, he hadn't even touched the Lord of the Rings. Gulu is indeed killing people for the Lord of the Rings, but we cannot blame the Lord of the Rings for this, just as football hooligans kill people for football, we cannot say that football is evil.
Our final conclusion is that the Lord of the Rings is not a killing weapon, but a health-preserving fairy. The so-called evil is just the result of some people with ulterior motives demonizing it.
The Lord of the Rings is so, so what about its maker: the so-called Demon King Sauron? Is it also a product of demonization? Please see "The Lord of the Rings" distorted interpretation (2): The Devil.
View more about The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring reviews
