Of course I expect Batman's new bomb TDK will add a head to this list. . .
The left hand beats the right hand. In fact, it doesn't make much sense. Ang Lee is the director, and Norton is the screenwriter and actor, just staggering. In my memory of the previous version of Hulk, one is the innovative attempt of Ang Lee to reproduce the original four-frame animation of the comics (ms is not very effective for me, because I am not a comic book fan), and the other is the super bounce of the desert chase (at the time) The wind of Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon has just blown, this bounce is too bamboo-like), and it is widely criticized for the lack of entertainment control of real commercial action films by literary film directors, and the veritable "Hulk panties problem". . It's a coincidence that Warner blatantly chose to completely forget to shoot a brand new Hulk, but still gave it to Norton, who is not too strong in literary taste, to write the script and starring. I don't know which muscle is too straight?
In fact, from the starring point of view, Eric Banner was also amazing, plus my beloved goddess Jennifer Connelly, vs. my own private No.1 Norton + competent horse-faced vase Liv Tyler, it should be half a catty, but I have really seen it. I just knew that between Norton and Liv, hehe, the chemistry is incredible! ! So the new version is extra points!
Let’s talk about the action scenes. This time the battle between the two demons is far better than the Iron Man one. It reminds people of Spider Man 3’s flurry of demons (this ms is a typical negative?), but it’s more layered, especially in NY. In the downtown area, it is indeed hot enough and shocking enough to satisfy my original intention to vent. So the new version adds points again!
The story line is very smooth. Norton’s writing is very traditional. It’s a combination of inheritance and transformation, the ambush, the exaggeration, the sensation, and the climax. It is completely under the rules. There are a few small humours, especially the special treatment of the "underpants problem" with casual teasing, I Is basically satisfied. As for the foreshadowing and analysing, they ended up rashly, and there was no deeper thinking like the entanglement between father and son in the previous edition. They thought it was a defect set by Hulk itself, and it was impossible to save. Unlike Marvel’s superhero, Hulk is an anti-hero at all, a monster, and what I don’t understand the most is what happened to the rack: I remember that in the previous version, Hulk couldn’t control his emotions-mainly Anger-turn around when you are angry. In this version, you should not be too excited. There are problems with emotions, intense exercise, fast pulse, and all kinds of excitement, so there is the most warm and funny scene in the film. . . I think the explanation given this time is closer to the result of a purely physiological reaction. Although it is more boring and less room for emotional and emotional development, it avoids the question of where a scientist who confuses me comes from so much anger. There are bonus points!
As for the lines that are not as cute as the Iron Man, I can only say that it is because Hulk is originally a sullen character, not as cool as the Iron Man~~~ In
particular, the first half of the selection needs extra points. It should be It’s in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, but where did I find such characteristic large mountain houses, layered on top of each other, colorful, very spectacular, I think, simpler than the background, than the famous roof chasing scene of Bonn 3. Moroccan Tangiers are still worth seeing, but Norton/Barna’s skill and chasing scenes can’t be compared with former agent Bonn.
In addition, the editing of the title is good, with a sense of comics. Norton blinked, idiot. .
View more about The Incredible Hulk reviews
