A character relationship diagram
Main character
Jerry Lundegaard (William H. Macy) Car Manager
Carl Showalter (Steve Buscemi)
Gaear Grimsrud (played by Peter Stormare)
Father-in-law Wade Wade (Harve Presnell)
Stan Grossman (Larry Brandenburg)'s father-in-law's confidant
Wife Jane Jean (Melissa Peterman played by Melissa Peterman) wife
Sheriff Marge Olmstead (played by Frances McDormand)
Sheriff’s husband Norm Gunderson (John Carroll Lynch)
Female Sheriff's classmate Mike Yanagita (Mike Steve Park Steve Park)
Shep Proudfoot Shep Proudfoot Indian-born stillshui city prison parole officer working as a worker in the auto repair shop
Relationship Graph
Two representations
Something kind of small, but it might be a big problem. ——"Ice Blood Storm" 1h 23m 12s
The above is the film (station B version) expressed by the director through the lens language of picture-in-picture at 1h 23m 12s. This is the clue given by the director when the film is about to end, the criminal is about to be arrested, and most of the information has been expressed!
I sighed before: If you don’t forget to put the label, there will be no intercontinental highway police. If you don’t kill the police, you won’t be seen by passers-by. If you don’t see them, you won’t be killed. If three people don’t die, they won’t be seen. Get the attention of the police; if there is no Gale’s gluttony, there would be no Carl’s gluttonous second company, no clues of prostitutes, there would be no Sheriff’s trip to Minneapolis; if there is no Carl’s stupidity, there would be no bargaining. Prostitutes, if they didn’t reveal their address during the process of looking for the old man, there would be no old man calling the police (I sighed at this time ●'◡'●). Without clues from the lake, there would be no case to be solved in time...
The impermanence of the world is caused by evil. The drama of the story is the attraction of the film. In addition to the drama, the Coen brothers' movies are absurd!
The film's means to achieve absurdity and drama is causality. This is the logical relationship that is easiest to be understood and accepted by people. Amplify the energy of the butterfly inciting wings, and the evolution process under the strong law of causality is the content of the film!
However, the real world is more chaotic and parallel, even if there is a weak connection, it is introverted, hidden, and invisible from a non-God perspective. This attitude was expressed vividly by the director in his later work "Old Nowhere", which is creepy-I kill you, it has nothing to do with you.
The above is just the appearance of the film. The film tells us bluntly. In essence, we need to actively think about it.
Thinking is actually a logical analysis of the behavior of the main characters, and the profile of the characters obtained is the core of the film. Because they are all backwards from perceptual to rational. First, I feel emotionally about where the film touches me, and then rationally analyze the specific reasons behind it. So it is more subjective and is for reference only.
Three simple character analysis
1 One of the villains' triangle: Jerry Lundgar
Car sales manager
Scene one, the old K club. As soon as he came in, he looked frankly. Who knew he actually asked the underworld to kidnap his wife. This meeting between the wicked trio was very informative.
First of all, the agreement is 19:30 or 20:30, and both parties stick to their opinions. Who remembered the time wrong? As the plot unfolds, we gradually get to know the characters, and we will find that this is a guy who can't do a simple thing but tries to make a big business. It can almost be concluded that the appointment should be 19:30, and Jerry was late.
Secondly, a seemingly honest person would kidnap his wife just to get $80,000 from his rich father-in-law. Is the relationship between the husband and wife broken and weak? Wife is hateful? A stingy father-in-law? Poor man? The answer to this is basically given in scene two. For the convenience of reading, I am here in advance: the night when I go home and the next morning, the couple interacted and answered this question forcefully. His wife is in charge of housework and does not care about Fendai. She is very kind to him, even a little bit obedient.
Regarding the kidnapping of his own wife, one of the future kidnappers, Karl’s question is very straightforward, "Why do you want to grab yourself instead of looking for your father-in-law and poor wife?" Jerry replied that he had a trouble he didn’t want to answer. Specifically, they don't know that I need money, even if they know they won't give it. Why didn't he tell his wife and father-in-law? It must have happened before and more than once, so that this kind of self-judgment will be made. What did he do that his father-in-law did not trust him? Then why doesn't his wife say something for him, and a good word by his father's side? I think it has happened before, but my father-in-law is strict and set the rules to do well in his own affairs.
Scene 2: Going home, Weng's post-dinner exchange
When the son wants to go out for dinner, the father-in-law’s attitude is against; Jerry’s attitude is in favor; the wife’s attitude depends on the husband. (The previous judgment on the wife came from this, and the next day when she trained the child, the wife really didn't speak much. No one listened)
After the meal, the wife cleaned the table, and the two of them talked, and they answered the real reason why Jerry wanted to kidnap his wife from the side-he fancyed a piece of land and wanted to build a parking lot, but it needed 750,000 US dollars. He has no money, but his father-in-law has. But I can't help it, and my wife doesn't have much weight. In his stupid plan, the answer to this question is to kidnap his wife. However, what he never expected was that the sudden visit of his father-in-law gave him an opportunity to request privately. So for the audience, the problem is that he needs 750,000 US dollars! And he told the kidnappers that the meat ticket is worth 80,000 U.S. dollars, and the two parties are equally divided! Sure enough, he didn't abandon his wife just for $80,000. Faced with no problem, on the contrary, the wife who treated him well, so cold and selfish, was able to come up with a plan to kidnap her for ransom. A three-way game between a stubborn guy who can do nothing, a powerful wise father-in-law, and a strange and variable kidnapper, why does he win?
Later, he insisted on his father-in-law and his confidant to wait for the kidnapper's call at home alone. After Stan reminded him, he remembered that his son was still at home. When I saw my child, maybe I just thought of kidnapping his wife and the son lost his mother. Of course, in his stupid mind, he might think that since the kidnapper is a partner, then the safety of his wife can be guaranteed, and he will give his son a mother soon. However, no matter what, a selfish, indifferent and stupid image will stand.
Scenario 3: Automobile sales center. Constantly recommending coatings to customers, saying that it can prevent oxidation and can save 500 US dollars in the future (it can be seen that the coating price must be a certain margin away from 500 US dollars). The customer's request was to buy a car for $19,500, which was negotiated in advance. As a result, you have now added a coating to me and asked me to spend more money. I will not do it. Jerry went to his colleague's office and took a round to tell the customer that the coating is $100 cheaper due to the special circumstances (the coating price is estimated to be between $200-250). This kind of operation method of constantly filling in items when the purchase is left is common in auto sales, computer sales and other fields, and it is a common method for profiteers to pursue profits. But you must either be superb and make people willing to pay money. If you don't have this ability, don't offend customers for petty gains. It is really not worth the loss. Without a long-term vision, you can only play smart, cherish/see small gains but forget the righteousness, and establish it. Personality determines fate, and fate has written the ending for his "kidnapping script".
Cao Cao said with a smile and said Yuan Shao: He is bold and courageous, and he is conscientious; Change the color severe to cowardly, to evaluate Jerry's basic fit.
In short, through a number of scenes, I have created an image of Vinono in life who seems to be honest and practical but very ambitious, unable to understand anything big, and indifferent and indifferent.
(Add a scene four: the car repair shop, talk to Shepp, Jerry hopes to contact the two kidnappers, but the old-fashioned Shepp said, no, I will let you contact Grimsrud, he will not replace the other One person vouched for (foreshadowing the subsequent flogging of Karl). Then Jerry opened his mouth to predict that it was unspeakable and reluctant to leave; there was also nervousness and smirk when confronted by the female police chief inquiring)
2 Villain's Triangle Two: Karl Showwart and Gail Grimsrud
Carl Showwater
People give nicknames no brains
Many people reported to the police that he looked funny. Careless to the extreme. Sure enough, there is no wrong nickname: no brains.
At first, he was aggressive towards "The Honest Man" Jerry, and then confronted the police with nothing but promises. Because a few dollars argued with the parking lot toll collectors, I was afraid that there would be no traces left.
Later, he was beaten by Shep (Shep Indian parole worker). On the one hand, Shep was really barbaric. On the other hand, Shepp didn't know Carl originally, and Carl's actions affected Shepp and put him in prison. Judging from the attitude of not having many BBs, Shepp and Gail Grimsrud are really the same people, no wonder Shepp introduced Gail to Jerry.
Gail Grimsrud
People are not happy about giving nicknames
An anti-social personality who does not seem to have fear and avoidance behaviors (the escape at the end seems to be contradictory to this conclusion, probably because of the innate fear of the law enforcement officers due to crime)
All his behaviors are representative, without analysis, which is impressive.
The relationship between the two
On the way to the kidnapping in Minnesota, he was unhappy and wanted to eat pancakes. Carl said that he had just eaten it, and the old K club went to the toilet 3 times an hour. It was obvious that it was a "rectal child". After being rejected by Carl, he stared blankly. Looking at him, it shows that the relationship between the two is not deep, it is just a simple understanding and cooperation. As a last resort, Carl compromised and said to stop at Brainerd (Baxter/Brainerd area). And tell her own appeal, get laid, and find a girl to sleep. Their movement is shown in the following figure. From Fargo to Minneapolis, route plan 3, halfway to the jungle, to the Brainerd area of Baxter, passing by the statue of Paul Banyan, a landmark building.
Karl gave the definition of his relationship with Gale: associate, business or work partner, quite accurate!
It was Gail that Jerry contacted through the middleman, but he did not expect to encounter the villain duo.
There are two common forms of evil, one is bluffing, which is invisible and visible; the other is invisible and invisible, hidden deep in the heart, suddenly casting cold arrows. The same thing is that there is no right and wrong view. The difference is that an evil is aggressive when facing weakness, and only promises when facing a strong; the aggressiveness of an evil is indistinguishable.
Gail’s evil is calm and expressionless, but it allows us to perceive his anger. Yes, from impatient to expressionless, just do it. Actions show his anger and arrogance (to life). Indifference). From headshot highway patrol, to chasing passersby...
The relationship between the duo is very delicate, they are briefly tied together for profit. They also parted ways because of their interests. Yes, Gale finally used a wood chipper to give Karyan, Ice and Blood Waterfall.
3 Villain Triangle Three: Wade and Stan Grossman
Wade
Jerry's father-in-law.
This is an extremely arrogant and extremely selfish guy. Look at everything from the perspective of a businessman. There is nothing wrong with doing business, for example, you can't do business to mediocre people. But from the perspective of life, the mental consciousness and behavior of son-in-law instrumentalization and materialization caused all tragedies.
For example, when discussing the ransom, the film is like a businessman, bargaining, say 500,000 US dollars (Jerry said that the kidnappers cost 1 million US dollars) When Jerry leaves the store to check out, the waitress and him are polite. He secretly saw that his father-in-law Wade and his assistant Stan didn't pay attention to this side, and they yelled and teased the little girl, making the waitress stunned. This is not only indifferent, it is heartless, but also extremely stupid.
Stan Grossman
Father-in-law's confidant.
He and Wade are one and two in one, and many words that Wade is inconvenient to say can be expressed through him.
Summary: The above is the main character of the film, now do a simple character analysis summary
Looking at the three groups of villains in the film, evil is the sign of all people, and selfishness is the root of evil.
The relationship between selfishness and evil. Westerners have a deep understanding of this. Take the Western religious teachings of the seven original sins that classify human evils, lust is the selfishness of flesh and blood; gluttony is the selfishness of wild fruits and beasts; (Confucius said that sex is also human nature, which is also a Confucian nature. The source of evil theory) Greed is the selfishness of having but not satisfied; laziness is the selfishness of the body; rage is the selfishness of the human heart on the verge of getting out of control; jealousy is the selfishness of having no others but not seeing the good of others, arrogance is the selfishness of having no others in the mind, only oneself, no one has no eyes. I don't know the selfishness of awe. Once a person is unaware of reverence, there is no standard to act. People with power and wealth can easily hurt others. In the eyes of these people, ordinary people are no different from ants.
From the selfishness of food and sex, to the increasing degree of greed and laziness, to the outrageous rage and jealousy, to the arrogance that is set on fire, people's selfishness gradually tends to evil and can be evil at any time.
In addition to Confucius, Xunzi and his disciple Han Feizi also discussed selfishness and evil in the era of Chinese scholars. At that time, both of them insisted that human nature is good and good. The difference is that Xunzi believes that good and good are evil; while Han Feizi jumped out of the analytical framework of sexual goodness and evil, expounding a naturalistic theory of human nature. He only describes the facts about Houli, and does not make value judgments. Xunzi believes that the further development of interest will inevitably lead to struggles and even social unrest, so evil. Han Feizi believes that people's interests and evils are universal in nature. Material desire is the first need for survival, and it is the origin of people thinking about problems and guiding their actions. Xunzi believes that human nature is changeable, there is a consciousness of change, and it must be changed to avoid disputes, turbulence and poverty. Han Feizi believes that good profit is a natural instinct induced by physiological needs and cannot be changed. When people do good deeds, they are more submissive but less righteous (we know today that ideas and beliefs will make people think differently, and this is the result of the enlightenment of future generations advocated by the philosophers). In view of the good interests of human nature, Xunzi advocated enlightenment reform. Han Feizi advocates making good use of the situation, restricting rewards and punishments, and strict laws and disciplines. The former ruled by courtesy, the latter ruled by law. (This paragraph of text comes from the Internet, the author is anonymous, slightly simplified)
4 Wife Jane
One of the tool people
Scene 1: The wife in Jerry's mouth: Miss Rich
This is how he described his wife and father-in-law to the two kidnappers: wife, wealthy; father-in-law, real well-off
wealthy, adj rich; n rich. The implied meaning is that wealthy refers specifically to having been wealthy for a long time, which implies that the family is rich. For example, wealthy is more appropriate than rich to describe the rich second generation who takes home pocket money on a monthly basis.
well-off, adj
The Oxford dictionary says that in addition to the use of well-off in negative sentences, rich and wealthy can basically be substituted for each other.
When Jerry first talked about his wife, he said that she was wealthy, which means to enjoy a wealthy life when she was born. The translation is a rich woman, which is very appropriate. When describing his father-in-law, he said that he is real well-off, although he is not a super rich (80,000 US dollars), but he is really rich (to be able to come up with money, the role of real).
Scene 2: At home.
When his wife debuted, it was when Jerry returned home from fargo after discussing the plan to tie his wife, she was preparing and cooking on the cutting board.
As an audience member, I saw Jerry came in to buy food. I thought I was a good man at home, but my wife said: Welcome home, how is Fargo's life? Just break my defense, if you are not secret, you lose your body. Is it so honest? Can't tell a lie? Or is his wife too silly and sweet to lie? In fact, it was Jerry's lack of focus. The wife went on to say that Dad is here, and Jerry looked embarrassed. From the perspective of the child's leaving home at the dinner table, Jerry is still the decision maker, but his father-in-law is obviously dissatisfied. The wife helped and said, It`s okay, dad. The father-in-law shook his head slightly, showing that he did not approve of his daughter's attitude, or his daughter's attitude to help his son-in-law, or expressed dissatisfaction with this frequently happening scene. They are all normal emotional expressions.
One more thing, as shown in the picture above, Minneapolis is southeast of Fargo, with a closer route of 375 kilometers. During the blizzard, driving at a speed of 60 kilometers per hour was about 6 hours and 15 minutes. The route chosen by the protagonists in the film is the Eastern Route, which is 401 kilometers, and it takes 5 hours to travel at a speed of 80 kilometers per hour. Jerry will go home after 20:30, so why is it going to be after 1 o'clock late. And catching up with dinner is really a very buggy thing. The only possible explanation is that Jerry stayed in Fargo that day, returned to the company where he went directly the next day, and returned home in the evening.
5 Sheriff Maggie
Toolman protagonist
Whether it has the symbolic meaning carried by the body, the perilous perspective at the end of the film, or the antithesis of its keenness, courage and intelligence, it all shows its tool-man attribute.
6 Sheriff's husband Noam
Tool Man 2
Uneasy mentality of disadvantaged position
The language of the lens is to make "breakfast" (omelette) by the shoulder
The second scene is that the virgin sheriff rests on his shoulder at the end of the film.
The changes in the details of the husband and wife's relationship come from the heart (self) reason (speech) feeling (self) enlightenment (language) when the female sheriff carried Gael in the ending credits-for a little money, (killed five people), life is much better than that Some money is much more expensive. The sentiment of the whole case is more than that, but also the relationship between husband and wife. It is directly reflected in the relationship between him and her husband. Take care of her husband's emotions more. Of course, this not only comes from the case itself, but also comes from classmate Mike.
The relationship between him and the female police chief, and the relationship between Jerry and his wife, formed a strong contrast.
The police chief's husband and wife are more harmonious. Facing the police situation in the middle of the night, Noam wants to make an egg for his wife who went out in the morning. The police chief showed a happy smile on her face. While plotting to kidnap his wife, and Jerry showed a false smile to his wife. Looking back, how ironic.
In addition, the female police chief and her husband belong to the brainerd police dept, which is the turning point in the map: the location where the brainless and unhappy insist on eating pancakes and maiden's day. The knife flag on the wall behind when she gave him the earthworms had the logo of the brainerd police dept, and the god of logging Paul Banyang and his calf Beibei were also on the logo.
7 Female Sheriff Classmate Mike
Tool Man No. 3
What he said is inconsistent with the facts. This gave the female police chief an enlightenment and was the psychological motivation to return to Jerry. His mental illness, loneliness. It also gave the sheriff more reasons to take care of her husband’s emotions.
Four questions about the plot of the film and the characters
1 Are the credits just black humor?
This is a true story. This is a true story
The events depicted in this film took place in Minnesota in 1987. The prototype of the story described in the film took place in Minnesota in 1987.
At the request of the survivors, the names have been changed at the request of the survivors.
Out of respect for the dead, the rest has been told exactly as it occurred. The rest of the story is truthfully restored
When I didn't know it was a black humor, the whole viewing process, guided by this subtitle, showed the following effects.
- Fascinating (a sense of substitution and immersion)
- Thought-provoking (Thinking brings people in-depth awareness of the film, and the entire film review is my confirmation and expansion of this awareness)
- Let the rest of the absurd have a solid foothold, and let people taste the director's theme more.
- At the same time, the loopholes in the behavior logic behind the heroine have been filled.
2 Why should the female police chief who has always performed perfectly ignore the advice of her colleagues and support the lone "one" person in unfamiliar and dangerous places without waiting for a pregnant body?
This is a behavioral logic bug that does not conform to daily logic and the image of the heroine. I realized my self-guided strategy through the opening captions: in reality, it must wait until the perfect ending of the companion, because there is a story prototype, it means that the case is closed. Since there are lone heroes in front, she must be safe at the end, otherwise, who will be responsible for the storyteller to connect everything (clues) together? !
Since her result is safe and sound, then the behavior is the consistent Hollywood narrative ending, which must be thrilling.
The completion of the strategy was only a moment, maybe less than a second, and then I saw the shot of the "ice and blood waterfall" flying by the wood chipper saw the man from the perspective of the female sheriff. At that moment, I knew it. It was not a thriller, but a fright. . The heroine is a real tool person.
At the same time, as the temperature of the film, the words in the car behind and the perception of the case all naturally come out, and then this perception is reflected in the changes in the details of the couple's relationship. What I said earlier is very clear.
3 Why establish the image of a female police chief who is pregnant?
The entire film has a unique style of imagery, and the subconscious mind still perceives a trace of temperature under the coldness, just like a trace of spring bred under the frozen earth. This point coincides with the pregnant policewoman's gestation of life. This attitude towards life, and Kea's disregard for life, constitute the yin and yang poles. It is an extremely hidden internal driving force. This is my own opinion, it seems to be over-interpreted, but if you pay more attention to the films of the Coen brothers. You will find that this view of life is faintly present in many movies.
4 Who is the photographer?
The opening 100s set the tone for the whole film, with boundless fine snow permeating the ice and snow, laying out with the melodious music. A bird tried its best to flap its wings twice and glide for several meters. It flew back and forth with great effort. After all, the wind and snow finally landed on the road. The road slowly approached a pickup truck, dragging a good brown Shiraz. Ciera, gradually sounded music accompanied by rapid drumbeats, a desolate and lonely tone permeated the screen.
To express such a scene, in addition to the director's intention, the photographer's ability to realize it is also very important. Who is the photographer?
Curiously checked, he almost dropped his chin. Roger Deakins, works such as "Shawshank's Redemption", "Murder of Green Toes", "Beautiful Mind", "Old Nowhere", "Land Thunder", "Border Killer", "Blade Runner 2049", "1917" and other works.
5 Why is the film called Fargo?
The confusion about the title, except for the conspiracy occurred in Fargo, basically occurred between Minneapolis and Brainard, why is the name of the film Fargo?
Fargo, North Dakota Fargo, North Dakota
Fargo (Fargo) is a city in eastern North Dakota, the economic center of North Dakota, with a population of approximately 90,000 in the mid-1990s. The location of the old K club. The population composition is 90% white, and the remaining ethnic minority is Indians, accounting for 2.5%. This explains why the Indian parole workers of Shep Shep of Indian descent know the underworld members in Fargo. Because he is most likely from this city (though Minnesota is also the hometown of Indians, but the population is diluted to less than 1.1%).
Minneapolis, Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota
Minneapolis (Minneapolis) is the largest city in the state of Minnesota in the United States. It is located in the southeastern part of the state and straddles the Mississippi River. It covers an area of 151.3 square kilometers and has an urban population of 407,207 (2014). Located in the north, at the same latitude as the central part of Heilongjiang in China, the temperature in winter can drop to minus 30-40°C. Early economic activities focused on the use of waterfall water power and the development of wood processing industries. (The introduction of the two places comes from Baidu Encyclopedia)
The two girls who were surveyed by the Sheriff were talking about the Twin Cites, referring to the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. The two face each other across the river. St. Paul is in the east and is the capital of Minnesota. The common metropolitan area of the two cities, including nearby suburbs and counties, covers an area of 12,000 square kilometers and has a population of about 2.69 million, accounting for half of the total population of the state. above.
The whole story takes place mainly between Minneapolis and Fargo, and Fargo is just a branch line. Why this name is used? Perhaps it is more consistent with the desolate, cold and indifferent colors of the region and the film.
6 Does the colossus of Paul Bunyan, which have appeared many times, have more symbolic meaning?
Headless and unhappy from Fargo to Minneapolis, unfinished, unhappy and hungry. In order to eat pancakes, the two detoured to the Brainerd area of Baxter, and finally lay on the bed of the Blue Bull Motel with two prostitutes-in order to eat the belly and go to bed, the two drove about 27 kilometers.
When you walk to Brainard, you can see Paul Bunyan's colossus standing on the side of the road from a distance. Paul Banyang is known as the god of logging. He is powerful, cutting trees as fast as cutting grass, and can cut a mountain in a day; he is huge, as high as 8 meters when he was born, and can span three streets with a small step; the five great lakes and He dug out the Mississippi River. As a state with many lakes, it is said that Nisota has more than 15,000 lakes, many of which can be related to him. This mythological figure, who became famous around 1910, is simply a true sample of American "Homo sapiens" god-making.
This colossus appeared several times, indicating that the axe of the upper and the end had established a connection with the sawmill. There is no symbolic meaning secretly. It's just a prop that deepens the style of the image and presents a sense of absurdity. This involves the cues imposed on people by the giant effect in psychology.
When people are faced with unfamiliar huge objects or spectacles, their bodies receive natural warnings from the brain, the brain accelerates, blood circulation, heartbeat, and muscles are all prepared accordingly to receive stimulation. People involuntarily produce feelings of fear, excitement or other Feel. For example, when facing giants, there is a sense of fear, and when facing magnificent wonders, there is a sense of excitement. People's cognition is affected by the environment, real-time, with action purposes, and limited by the objective subject. This universal principle governs almost all behaviors, of course, it also includes the behaviors of the characters in the film.
The sound of five blood falling
Looking at the whole movie, except for a few tool men and the female police chief who is a tool man, everyone is evil. The Coen brothers have an extraordinary ability to recognize and express the evil of human nature.
When I was young, I didn't know much, but now I slowly feel the selfishness that oozes out of the Ansa's bones. This original sin is so ingrained that everyone (themselves) accepts it and takes it for granted. This can explain many problems in Chinese-Western exchanges. For example, they don’t understand our “goodness”; for many of us, living is a very happy thing; not understanding the essence of humility is (seeing others as) Equality and balance (it can be roughly understood as abandoning first and then taking, in fact it is equivalent exchange); I don’t understand why the Virgin Mary phenomenon is widespread in the West. In fact, the more we lack, we must establish something! Just like our web articles, in the early days, the idea of killing and decisiveness was popular, and the summit works that portrayed the image of the wicked person as the protagonist were popular such as blasphemy. In fact, these morals have restrained us for too long. It's like we picked up Confucius today to report grievances directly. Yes, no matter what Confucius said and how to repay virtue, Confucianism later transformed to repay grievances by virtue in order to adapt to the ruler's rule. So we are all morally perfect, forgive this today, and forgive that tomorrow. Isn’t it because our moral values are so high that we have not been good at abandoning the moral bottom line?
The Anza people never say that this is their own selfishness and the resulting evil. On the contrary, in order to cover up, various clever words are used. To reach the top is to be politically correct. Then, use the guise of political correctness to achieve selfishness. In other words, he is good at doing inhumane under the guise of humanity.
For example, minority groups who often march and demonstrate. Isn't they just for their own personal gain? Why do we speak of self-interest? It is because in this process of fighting for rights, the rights of others are bound to be violated. Are rights obtained out of thin air? No, it is obtained through the concession of others. Just like the black people's racist struggle, why should a Chinese teacher say "that" be removed? Equal rights is right, but the essence of enjoying privileges under the guise of fighting for equal rights is not what many people have in mind?
Just like black life is expensive, do blacks really oppose racial discrimination? No, they only oppose racial discrimination against blacks, not racial discrimination itself. Otherwise, why would they split the Asian affirmative movement?
Opposing racial discrimination is the pursuit of justice and fairness. After opposing racial discrimination against oneself, oneself racially discriminates against others. What is this?
This is the black Americans, living on the land of the United States, influenced by the American culture, they have become like this one or two hundred years after leaving Africa. What are the Chinese Americans living in the continental United States, don't you feel it? Those who are seriously westernized and want to go there, what do they look like, have they forgotten the sweet air of the United States and the Chinese with cheap bones?
China’s chivalrous spirit has never been to defeat a bully and then become a bully. Our chivalry is to give mercy and help to the weak, to punish the bullies, to shove away when things happen, and to hide in the name. This kind of chivalry is the national foundation (one of the spirits) that the Han nation formed during the Qin and Han dynasties. Westerners/Americans don't understand this, they think that China will do evil if it becomes stronger. Isn't it just to save a gentleman's belly with a villain's heart/save others with oneself?
We have not had a good standard for measuring the degree of Westernization today. Because the reality of the education and feelings received by each person constructs our three views, the method of measurement is also very simple. It's an attitude toward evil, and a more strict attitude is an attitude toward selfishness. Tradition is to not tolerate evil attitudes, and there must be a sense of improvement or guidance when dealing with selfishness. Westernized people will be relatively tolerant of evil, such as exempting the death penalty (whatever legal experts think, what ordinary people think is important). When dealing with selfishness, the more you hold on to be normal without changing, the more Westernized you are. Judging from the trend of online speeches in recent years, Western cultural invasion has been very successful in terms of quantity, and the younger, the more Westernized. (Objectively, our education has not focused on the concept of good and evil. In recent years, the popularization of traditional culture is actually a bit late, and the dregs of folk Chinese education is even more annoying)
Selfishness is not restricted, and restrictions including self-control and otherness will develop into evil. As a selfish appearance, evil is a common image expressed in Western art (here, an image is taken from the ancient meaning, a method of classification and analysis of Use "Xiang" to refer to a class of things. In this sentence, the "Xiang" can be replaced by the common Western expression "theme", but if you are interested in the Yijing and Wei-Jin culture, you should immediately feel that "Xiang" is more important. Appropriate. Because the image can refer to a class of seemingly unrelated things. The theme cannot. Take a simple example, such as the classic concept of the image "one, two, yin, and yang". One, chaos is one. One life, two, yin, Yang, each one regenerates two, big yang and shaoyang, big yin and shao yin, yin and yang are referred to, big yang and shao yang are more detailed and more specific. For example, yin and yang are used to refer to men and women, and big yang and shao yang are used to refer to adult males and juvenile males. Another example is the long sentence, "Preparing for the week will mean laziness, and if it is common, there is no doubt. Yin is within the yang, not the right of the yang. The sun, the lunar yin-the more careful the preventive measures, the more vigilant the mind will be slack, common things I don’t want to think about it. The darkness is hidden in the light, not the opposite of the light. The more open, the more the darkness is hidden.” This sentence explains all similar incidents, such as the Taiwan police. The Secretary shook hands with the underworld brother to make peace).
Express evil, such as the classic movie "Dog Town." Although the film is classic, its overly artistic expression shuts out many ordinary people who are accustomed to popular style expressions. But if you can tolerate its form for fifteen or twenty minutes, it won't be so difficult to endure after entering the movie. The process of watching the movie is a bit painful. If you insist on watching it, you will appreciate the following words: If you, as an audience, feel the comfort and comfort of revenge in the final destruction, then you will become a part of the director’s social experiment. It’s—he spent three hours destroying the heroine’s kindness and killing the audience’s ethics and compassion. If you experience the pleasure of violence, then the director has succeeded. He forced out the human evil of the audience, echoed the evil of Dogtown, and extended the scope of Dogtown from the "flat" on the screen to the outside world. Of course, if you feel endless sorrows and sorrows after you are comfortable, it means that your three good views have returned to the high ground (brain), and you are a good person.
The Chinese people have a history of at least two thousand years of exploring and improving human nature, from the beginning of Laozi to the Confucianism who ruled the royal court . Westerners reach a reconciliation with their own evil in religion, that is, admit that it exists, and constantly release it to do evil, and then use religion as a tool to repent to show salvation. The most straightforward manifestation is Western myths and stories. God is the shadow of man, and so is God, what is more to man?
Eastern God is full of our shadows. We know selfishness and seek to change selfishness and the evil of human nature. The previous distinction between Xunzi and Han Feizi is very clear, and Confucianism has shaped the Chinese people for more than 2,000 years. Eastern civilization builds a framework of rules with morality, allowing people to operate in an orderly manner. We truly believe in morality, and a group of people who do not believe in morality export universal values such as morality and rights to us in order to achieve the purpose of self-promotion and quantification of others. In fact, when it comes to things, they will show their faces under the demon mirror. Treating others and treating oneself is so divided, double standard is a very polite term.
For example, the western spirit of contract that was advertised by the Chinese in the early years . Their spirit is based on a contract, not on their hearts.Such clauses are indispensable in Western contracts, and how much liquidated damages should be paid for breach of contract. When an interest far exceeds the liquidated damages, they will not hesitate to abandon the contract, the spirit of the contract? Humph, it's just a piece of paper to protect his interests. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the two aircraft carriers under construction were unsustainable, but one day the continued construction may still pose a threat to the U.S. military hegemony. After evaluating the materials of the hulls, the Americans passed a Norwegian shipbuilding company to Ukraine. A contract that is difficult to refuse, a shipbuilding contract. The merchant ship was so large that it could only be built on the zero berth where the aircraft carrier was parked under construction. At the same time, the order is very urgent, the request will be opened soon, and the deposit under the order is also very generous. What about the aircraft carrier? Coincidentally, another American scrap steel recycling company came to the door and said that one ton of scrap iron was collected for $450... When the disintegration of the aircraft carrier was basically over, the two Western companies changed their minds, and the Norwegian shipyard said that it was accepted. Due to the market environment, the original order will be cancelled, and the liquidated damages will be compensated. American companies say 450 is too expensive, 150 is just right. The aircraft carrier has been disintegrated, and it has to be sold for $150 a ton (the United States has even earned back its liquidated damages). In this two contracts, the Soviet Union’s investment of billions of dollars for several generations for decades, froze at the moment of the collapse of the Soviet Union, and then, with a few million dollars of investment, eliminated two ships with a total value of 5 billion dollars. Aircraft carrier is really a cost-effective business. This is the spirit of contract. Back then, Jack Ma tore up the contract and left Alipay in the country, which was notoriously infamous. However, showing the footprints of all people's economic activities in the eyes of Americans is really something we can bear? Regardless of foreign public opinion, there are countless people in the country who have jumped and cursed, but no one mentions righteousness. Some articles can still be searched now, and I don’t know if it delayed their capital upgrade or was brainwashed badly by the West. There is also copyright that has been brainwashed by the West. Copyright is one of the important tools for the West to maintain world hegemony. In terms of basic logic, it is normal and good to have copyright protection for creators to encourage and protect them. But is today's copyright still the copyright at the beginning of the design? Today's few copyrights have actually become another form of monopoly, and copyright protection has become the protection of monopoly and the protection of huge profits. Capital uses copyright as a monopoly tool, natural barriers, restrictions on others to develop, and constantly expands the boundaries of copyright, such as the copyright extension bill in the United States and the Mickey Mouse bill that expires in 2023. I don’t know if it will cause waves. . Westerners plagiarize more than anyone else in areas that they are not good at. At that time, he never talked about copyright. When he is ahead and has an advantage, he starts talking. For example, in the field of games, Japan’s Step all over the world. Numerous European and American companies drew nourishment from it and made a lot of head-changing works. If you don’t believe me, compare the arcade game Bejeweled (segac2 substrate) launched by Sega in 1990 with the well-known Popcap Games game Bejeweled (Bejeweled) launched in 2001 and sold 25 million copies. . Baokai also has famous works Zuma and Plants vs. Zombies. You can go to station B to watch this video "[Game Detective Ice] The History and Controversy of the Classic Childhood Game "Zuma" to learn about European and American understanding of plagiarism in the game field (The video is about 9 minutes and 50 seconds).
From the public opinion, the truthfulness of copyright is not offended, and he repeatedly slaps himself in the face through the small account, and is proud of it, and he will fall into the trap of others. Today's children know too little about the past, and in this rapidly changing era, there are too few old traces left behind, so that they can't catch the shadow of the past. We are rich today and can consume, but don’t forget the past. When we were poor, when we were blocked, many of the industrial systems built by our grandparents were imitations and many were not copyrighted, but he supported us. The spine, let us stand up. To forget the past and history is tantamount to betrayal. For example, Hong Kong and Taiwan’s popular music in the 7080s and 90s, Nakajima Miyuki feeds most of the Chinese music circle at every turn. It is said that Nakajima Miyuki has more than 70 covers, but it can be said to feed most of the Chinese music circle. Where are Jiachang, Li Taixiang, Li Shouquan, Hou Dejian, Ye Jiaxiu, Luo Dayou, Li Zongsheng, Wah, Chen Huanchang, Chen Zhiyuan, Jay Chou, Xu Guanjie, Huang Jiaju, Lu Guozhan, Gu Jiahui, Li Xiaotian, Lu Guanting, Huang Zhan, Cui Jian, Guo Feng, Zheng Jun, etc. ? (The above are well-known musicians of the older generation and the best of the new generation. There must be omissions. Not to mention the starry music producers in the 1980s and 1990s. I hope that the post-00s will have the opportunity to learn about the music library of the 80s and 90s. Let’s talk about the singers in detail) We are not uncertain about the positive influence of the Japanese music scene on the Chinese music scene, but the proposal of this slogan will really plunge the general public who are not familiar with the history of pop music into historical nihilism and form a so-called cultural consensus. This consensus is disgusting.
After talking about the spirit of contract and copyright protection, let's talk about the modern management system established under Western thinking, which is full of distrust of human nature. The root cause of the materialization and exploitation of people lies in the motif of believing in the selfishness of human nature. One of the negative feedbacks of contemporary young people in China is the so-called fish learning, and this bloody feedback stems from the fact that I give my youth to you. Do you take my heart down?
I would like to remind again that the discussion on the spirit of contract, copyright protection and modern management system is based on the absolute and abuse of it. Fair use is appropriate and beneficial, but because of its rationality and legitimacy, it is easy to paralyze people and fall into the trap of dogmatism. Do you still remember the original text? Dayang, Dayang. Be vigilant.
Above, for the same discovery of personal evils, the starting point of the East and the West may be the same as the initial thinking, but they have moved in different directions later. One made fireworks and the other made an atomic bomb. It's really an interesting subject.
Finally, I sent a piece of text from the netizen yanymax of station b
The teacher said that Western civilization does not have any tolerance. I very much agree. Here I will talk about my own summary. The quintessence of Chinese civilization is the diversified spirit of integration and integration of the three religions, while the quintessence of Western civilization is the dualistic and opposite monotheistic spirit of confrontation and differentiation. This is also the most significant difference in the logic of the bottom thinking between the East and the West, and this difference can run through almost all the differences between Eastern and Western civilizations. Political system: Historically, we are a unified dynasty system with normative and legal systems, and the West is a state. The feudal system of division by feudal rule, until now, Europe has not achieved unity but has become more and more fragmented, and we have been pursuing unity. In terms of medicine, Chinese medicine emphasizes a holistic view, treating people as a whole with four diagnosis and treatment based on syndrome differentiation. Western medicine emphasizes the improvement and repair of the functions and functions of local organs. Natural Chinese medicine is mainly based on "auxiliary and guiding", and chemical western medicine is mainly based on "elimination and killing". One is the auxiliary strengthening mode and the other is the war mode. In terms of thought and philosophy, Chinese philosophy more embodies the unity of nature and man, and man should integrate into nature, let it go, and respect the objective evolution of history. Western philosophy puts more emphasis on the individual pursuit of free will. People should transform nature and the world, and how to transform is based on the impossible Plato ideal of national reform. This is true in other languages, art, literature, science and technology, martial arts, evolution and development of civilization, religion, disciplinary system, logic of thinking, and all aspects of human life, family relations, and social relations between people. This difference runs through.
Derived from the rumor that "the defeat of the contemporary crusaders is invincible with capital." Comments under "The Psychological Deterrence of Curve Touted"
View more about Fargo reviews
