"Pirates of Fire" personal viewing essays, non-serious film reviews I don’t know if this kind of plot was considered mediocre in 1995, but today, there are very typical elements of police and gangster movies, and I can see the taste of Hong Kong movies in the middle. I don’t know if police and criminal films were shot like this at that time. For example, when robbers robbed, the background music was loud, and I couldn’t tell which specific movies had similar plots, but I felt very familiar, as well as Al Paciro’s. The character background, a policeman who is obsessed with arresting suspects and is ashamed of his family, this is nothing more typical. In addition, the robber played by Robert De Niro doesn’t speak a lot of cruelty and emphasizes loyalty. I think this is one thing. It's a very good crime movie. It can't be said to be a classic, but it's absolutely wonderful! In addition, I want to say that Al Pacino’s acting skills should have been noticed by many people. An inappropriate analogy is that when we were in school, there were always a few or one of the classmates who played basketball together. It’s like playing in his hands. If you don’t accept it, you won’t be able to play with it. No matter how many people are onlookers, he can play a good shot. Probably this is what Al Pacino’s performance brings. My intuition is that he is able to use acting freely and handily... (1000 words omitted), like breathing, do you know that feeling? Enjoy it! The last scene was like watching two kings PK. It was so interesting. Robert De Niro fell in a pool of blood. Al Pacino won. At this moment, they even stood shoulder to shoulder. It is not obtrusive, has no sense of disobedience, and has a clear distinction between public and private. For Al Paciro, the police is a job, and for Robert De Niro, the robbers are also his job. In private, they don’t know each other. Friends of, are very dramatic and have a sense of fatalism. They like this ending!
View more about Heat reviews
