Force reading and comprehension, no need!

Filiberto 2022-03-21 09:01:09

At the end of the film, the detective said to Marta that you won not because of everything Harlan designed for you, but because of your kindness. (main idea)

When I saw Gao Zan, some said, "The old man knew everything from the beginning." (?)

Even if the answer given at the end of the movie is clear, some people still can't help but throw out the conspiracy theory that "it's not that simple". . .

There is a saying that Harlan originally planned to commit suicide and knew that Marta had injected the correct medicine. It's just a suicide that counts. There are many loopholes in this statement:

1) Harlan made a lot of arrangements for his birthday party, and then said to each of his children before discussing things. He had no reason to commit suicide on that day.

2) After Harlan heard that Marta had used the wrong medicine, he said some cool words at first to comfort her. In the end, knowing that he was not saved, more wanted to let Marta escape punishment.

3) Harlan will give the inheritance to Marta to show that he cares for Marta. He has no reason to know the truth and makes Marta bear the guilt of killing herself for the rest of his life.

4) Haran is not a doctor, how can he be 100% sure that the heroine did not use the wrong medicine because the body is normal within a few minutes.

5) Haran knew that the heroine did not use the wrong medicine and didn't tell her, which made her panic. Then use suicide to get the police to catch the person who changed the dressing? ? ? This is not necessarily too strange. Even if he originally planned to commit suicide, he would trust the police too much. If there were no detectives, then Haran's plan would have failed and even killed the poor heroine.

6) If Haran knows that the heroine is not a criminal, why arrange for the heroine to do things that get rid of the crime. He could completely drive off the heroine, go downstairs by himself, and then commit suicide. Wouldn't it be that there is no silver three hundred taels in arranging the heroine to do those things? And the risk is greater.

Furthermore, even if Harlan knew the personalities of his grandsons Ranson and Marta, he could guess everything they did. What about the police and detectives? Harlan had never seen them before, how could he predict their behavior.

The key to the final outcome is the detective:

1) The detective saw Harlan’s mother and knew that Ranson had gone back

2) Detectives found Marta's car on the scene of the laboratory, followed the car and took Lanson away.

3) The detective's dialogue with Marta asked Marta to find the verification result.

4) The detective exposes Ranson when Marta wants to surrender.

Imagine if the detective does not exist, what will happen:

The police declares suicide-the lawyer announces the will-Lanson takes Marta away-Lanson burns the laboratory-Marta goes to see the servant-Lanson reports Marta to the police-Marta surrenders -The new will is invalidated and the old will is implemented-everyone gets the estate including Lanson

Therefore, the detective is definitely a necessary factor in the final result.

While the detective was hired by Lanson, Harlan couldn't predict the appearance of the detective after his death. It is even more impossible to predict what the police and detectives will do. Unless another conspiracy theory

In short, the plot is like Sudoku. If one of the answers is changed, the other answers must also be changed, causing the entire logic to conflict with the original setting.

Harlan is set in the film as a suspense novelist, but he is not a prophet. How could he risk ruining Marta to design everything in less than 5 minutes.

If the whole story falls into the plot routine of "because I know everyone will do it, so I choose to do this", then this movie is a bit too unconventional. If this is the case, then this detective film is a bit embarrassing. The detective in it turned out to be just a tool, and he couldn't find the truth. Forehead,,,,,,

There are also some inferences that the heroine is the big boss, uh, uh. . . It is really unnecessary to force reading and comprehension, regardless of the settings in the film. Unless there is a second season, overthrow some of the existing settings.

View more about Knives Out reviews

Extended Reading
  • Marlon 2021-10-20 18:59:21

    If it's just a reversal of the truth, it is at best a high-profile version of "The Invisible Guest", but the brilliance of this film lies in its free gift of God’s perspective and mocking and deciphering of God’s identity, which makes the psychological feelings ups and downs. The magnification of geometric magnification. How to find a criminal motive that does not exist? It is speculation, falsification, and insight into the future tense; how to restore the crime scene that has become an established fact? It is the tampering, substitution and copying of the past tense. Good criminal reasoning movies are not the truth, but the power of philosophy.

  • Wiley 2022-03-24 09:01:10

    I love beauty in the process, but later I think it's all pits. This old man Wenger shouldn't have left. For so many years of his family business, the master who still relies on tactics to feed himself, he died too unjustly. Guess which South American country this successor is from? Paraguay, Uruguay, Ecuador are still Venezuela, Chile, Peru, and in the end they are just puppets. One of the big Hollywood anti-Trump films.

Knives Out quotes

  • Benoit Blanc: I spoke in the car about the hole at the center of this doughnut. And yes, what you and Harlan did that fateful night seems at first glance to fill that hole perfectly. A doughnut hole in the doughnut's hole. But we must look a little closer. And when we do, we see that the doughnut hole has a hole in its center - it is not a doughnut hole at all but a smaller doughnut with its own hole, and our doughnut is not whole at all!

  • Marta Cabrera: What was that about will readings being boring?

    Benoit Blanc: The exception that proves the rule.