The most important thing about this kind of scene film is to make every battle scene different, and every time it is good-looking. This director did it. The first time I held it, the second time I singled out, and the third time. The battle beast, the final defeat... is still very interesting, but it is just watching, you don’t need to go to the theater with your head.
This not only reminds me of the "Hero" a few years ago, it is actually the same as this movie. One type is seductive, not to mention that there are two take-all beauties of all ages, two take-all handsome guys of all ages, and two take-all kung fu masters of all ages. Compared with this film, it can be There are so many places to watch. Then why did "Heroes" fail? I think Zhang Yimou was unwilling to admit that he had arranged a visual film. In fact, if he had said that, he would have been a pioneer of this type of film. Alas, in one thought...
and there are other shortcomings of this film. Everyone knows that this kind of film depends on the scene, the foreplay is too long, who cares about the queen’s emotional world, who cares about those The position of a member of Parliament, and the less you send soldiers, the better you look. If Sparta has more fighters than Persia, then watch a fart? This kind of movie, don't have so many anti-climaxes to control the rhythm, okay. This kind of movie, who It’s not a fast-forward watch. If you are educated, you still have to delay this time? So this film also has a tendency to "heroic" preaching, but fortunately, the director did not take this as a selling point, otherwise, another director Zhang was born. That's...
So, I watched Sin City again.
http://tin1016.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!49A79B57DDF65AA1!1244.entry
View more about 300 reviews
