Because superhero movies are considered to be cool films without brains, so breaking the genre, the content has the brain, and it is sure to be sought after as masterpieces? The question is, shouldn’t it be brainy, interesting, rich and profound?
In my opinion, anti-routine, deliberately different from routine type is just a shortcut to creation. Take the shortcut to God's work, is that God's work? Are the fans of superheroes excited, because they operate frequently online? Don't think of him as a superhero movie, how about treating him as an ordinary good movie?
Of course, this film portrays the characters very well. The story allows us to substitute a tragic character who has a mental condition, has a miserable childhood, and finds his father in adulthood, and has produced a very shocking movie-watching experience. This kind of shock is in harmony with street politics, and it is even more amazing. It seems to present the most complicated things of our time in a simple way.
So it is not only presenting a mental illness murder, the story is telling the familiar world of Gotham.
In this world, the rich and powerful have created a perfect and hierarchical society, and have the ability to use all media tools to occupy the mind to determine the aesthetics. The incompetent people at the bottom can only become mutually contagious monsters in despair. We all know what the symbols are metaphors, and they clearly present the present.
"Joker" can spread so well on social networks and has such a good reputation. Isn't it a reflection of the daily news phenomenon? So the movie "Joker" became a "exquisite success".
First, kick the most proliferating and profitable superhero movies in recent years to the altar, sinking to the bottom and countering routines, focusing on the formation of villains. Focus the anger on the "positive heroes" who never leave the country. Then, it resonated with the anger at the bottom, killed the elite, and took to the streets. Cool 2 times in a row. Phoenix's acting skills are so sad again, and the good ones are too much.
Can it be refined? Fans, the general public and the elites are all so happy, in a big era of stagnant development, a movie that appropriately evoked large-scale thinking. But is it really good-looking?
Let the intellectual elite see the goodwill of caring for the social movement of thinking at the bottom, and after being touched, they can publish large-scale thinking like a lotus flower. Let the people at the bottom wear masks and applaud on the dark seats to frighten foreign tourists. The creators are simply human beings, and all the arrangements are not leaking. But is it really good-looking?
This is really ugly. If you are sick, you can only see a doctor. If a doctor is not good, you can only wait for the results of scientific research. Brutal destruction of the rules can only be exchanged for another brutal rule guardian. The distorted superhero is born, it is better to wear the underwear to save the world Superman, at least not to take the perverted seriously.
Using superb acting skills and artistic presentations to cater to vicious emotions, this thing is not pretty, no matter how you look at it. I think this is an elegy to an American romantic fantasy story. The hero is fake, but the opposite is that the new symbol is worth continuing to consume.
It's black or white, isn't it a dead end to tell stories like this?
If you are in Beijing for a role like the clown, I strongly recommend that you go to the Shan Liren club to talk about the talk show. No matter how weird and helpless you are, someone can help you sort out your thoughts and make a good joke. Bring happiness to a few viewers who are more helpless than you. Warming each other is not that serious. If you still feel sad, just go to make a skewer, take a cup and go slowly with the Chinese, don't go to a dead end, don't think that the meaning of death is more important than living, being alive.
Like a Chinese.
View more about Joker reviews
