David Fincher's exploration of the truth

Guadalupe 2022-03-14 14:12:21

The whole movie was watched in three days.

As a movie with such a theme, I thought the rhythm would be like "The Seven Deadly Sins", "Fight Club", and "The Lost Lover". But it is probably in the middle 1/3 of the film that the whole rhythm is deliberately developed. The ground slowed down. The ZODIAC matter was put on hold, and he stopped writing letters, or left any clues, which made me bored.

After I watched the entire movie, I discovered that this variation is a very clever technique.

As we all know, the timeline of a movie is not a 1:1 restoration of life. The boring part of life accounts for most of the time, and the wonderful part is only in that moment. Therefore, when we see movies that stimulate tension, they tend to compress other timelines, and try to restore the tension and stimulation 1:1 as much as possible.

But the interesting phenomenon in this "Zodiac" is that at the low point in the whole case, that is, when the media no longer pays attention to the crime team, it seems that David Fincher still wants to take this paragraph. The timeline is presented in its entirety, or "less compression".

This led to a very dramatic result: the audience was fooled. We followed the agents and felt the sense of emptiness, the sense of emptiness that was forgotten but could not be dealt with with heavy resistance. But this also implies that something the director is trying to tell the audience will reveal the mystery in the next 1/3. At the end, I think many people are at a loss. How come it ends in a hasty way? There is no suspense at all, the thrill of revealing the truth in the cool film! Yes, it seems to me that this movie is not so much about ZODIAC, a vain murderer who is unknown from beginning to end, as it is about exploring the essence of "truth". The investigators in the crime squad lost their confidence and gave up the investigation; the media had long forgotten this murderous news, and the "truth" was concealed as a meaningless symbol in countless updated headlines. The male protagonist has always been curious about the truth, or paranoid—even abandoning his family. Even when we all think he can really crack all of this, he will be crazy. He would also be annoyed to force the witnesses in the prison to say: Can you just admit it?

People don't want the truth so much, they just want the truth they think.

View more about Zodiac reviews

Extended Reading

Zodiac quotes

  • Melvin Belli: Inspector Toschi.

    [holds up bloodied shirt piece]

    Melvin Belli: It is my belief that this is a window into this man's soul. Killing is his compulsion. Even though he tries to ignore it, it drives him. It's in his blood.

    Dave Toschi: Maybe. Or maybe he just likes the attention.

  • [Graysmith visits with Ken Narlow in Napa]

    Robert Graysmith: Does the name Rick Marshall mean anything to you?

    Ken Narlow: [it does] What are you after?

    Robert Graysmith: What have you got?

    Ken Narlow: Hypothetically, you just named my favorite suspect in the whole case. This is off the record. Couple of years back, I was trying to get Marshall's prints. I handed him a photo. He looks at it. He's about to give it back and he says, "My goodness, I got fingerprints all over this." And he wipes them off.

    Robert Graysmith: Why didn't you test him for handwriting?

    Ken Narlow: Because when they finally did run his prints... they cleared him against the one in Stine's cab.

    Robert Graysmith: So it's not him?

    Ken Narlow: Maybe yes, maybe no.

    Robert Graysmith: No? What do you mean?

    Ken Narlow: Zodiac left gloves behind at the scene. If he had the foresight to bring gloves with him, how the hell's he gonna accidentally leave a print behind?

    Robert Graysmith: But it was in the victim's blood.

    Ken Narlow: Could have been one of the bystanders, or a cop just reaches out... Boom. False print.

    Robert Graysmith: But that print disqualified 2,500 suspects.

    Ken Narlow: Which is why we used handwriting.

    Robert Graysmith: But not for Rick Marshall.

    Ken Narlow: S.F.P.D. saw a handwritten sign in the window of his house, decided it looked nothing like the Z letters, so they moved on.

    Robert Graysmith: How do they know Rick Marshall wrote the sign?

    Ken Narlow: [smiles] My thoughts exactly. Rick Marshall was a Navy man. He received code training. He was also a projectionist at a silent film theater.

    Robert Graysmith: How do I get a copy of Rick Marshall's handwriting?

    Ken Narlow: Three ways. One, get a warrant; which you can't. Two, get him to volunteer; which he won't.

    Robert Graysmith: Yeah, and three?

    Ken Narlow: Get creative.