In addition to the inspiring narrative technique of the film, the most impressive is the statement made by the host at the end of the film:
"The sick people in the crowd must be blamed on our over-developed civilized society, strangely catering to violence, and disrespect for life. These are all used by our government to implement self-defense as the doctrine to educate those How young people hurt and kill. The most popular things in today’s society are those cartoons, TV shows, and movies in newspapers. These things can create new meanings for crimes committed. Somehow a person can be on their own. When China’s civilization was shaken by the philosophy of violence, it remained silent. The so-called power is axiom. From this point of view, the crime of Charles Joseph Whitman is the crime of the entire society."
The logic is simple: "Society ignores the harm of violence" >> "Individuals are unable to resist the general environment and become insensitive" >> "The sick are born".
This is pretty beautiful, but the use of the word "crime" for "sick people" deliberately or unintentionally avoids some facts: reluctance to accept randomness, denial of antisocial illogicality, and inability to understand natural rebellion. And the possibility of being unable to be taught the day after tomorrow. The moderator still satisfies his own experience and rhetoric of "individuals in society".
In the first 4/5 of the film, the "sniper" is almost described as an AI. There is no blood, no emotion, no eating, no shit. At the end of the conversation, the front line turned and began to use the laws of human society to judge this AI from Texas. The "forgiveness" unilaterally declared by the "victim" at the end of the film is also funny. AI killing can also be called "being evil", what do you forgive?
So want to fucking reconcile? No fucking door.
View more about Tower reviews
