The movie "Code 211" For me who cannot recognize the faces of foreign celebrities, I usually can't recognize these big-name celebrities. But Nicholas Cage's name is still familiar to me, but his face and name do not match. The actor I would rather call him Gorgeous Witch. Do you think Nicholas Kezi, well, this name is what I was able to match to the master later, that is, I think it looks a lot like the witch in the Smurfs. Let me talk about it first, I saw the reviews of this movie on the Internet, they are really unanimous. I think it's bad, but it doesn't mean that it's particularly bad. It's just that there is nothing particularly remarkable, it's a very general movie that doesn't match Nicholas Cage's fame. This film and the appearance of black boys, I think, is still a possible idea, but it is a bit redundant. After all, this boy didn't play any role in the movie. If you say it has far-reaching significance, it won't be enough. It's like a special plot forced into this shootout. After all, every gunfight movie will have one or two disadvantaged groups, or one or two characters who affect the mood of the male protagonist. This movie, this, the plot setting, I think there is a big unreasonableness, that is, at the beginning, the introduction to the culprits was very, very powerful, firepower, and IQ was very high. It is estimated that criminal police have also appeared, and special forces have also appeared. What a powerful enemy, but when the gun battle really happened, it turned out to be the person responding outside. He was very uncomfortable and shot the police first. Why are the people robbing inside and shooting at the outside? Moreover, the police hadn't even approached him yet, so he could pass by as long as he calmed down. Therefore, the occurrence of the gunfight is inexplicable. Why did the gangster, who could even think of this way, shoot at the police very uncomfortably? And even after a gun battle with the gangster, a gangster killed one of the two policemen. Anyway, a gun battle happened inexplicably at the beginning. Che, in such a big city, even if there is an explosion, but there is a gun battle in another place, wouldn't it be possible to send people? For such a long period of gun battle, it was only supported by two criminal policemen, and one of them was killed. Firefighters can arrive at the scene within five minutes. Why can't the special police? There has already been an explosion over there, which means that the first danger has passed. Even if there is a potential second explosion, there is a gun battle here, a gun battle. Couldn't we send someone over? It takes so long? This is the first unreasonable place, and the second very unreasonable place. Even if the bank is hijacked, there are so many hostages in it, then Well, even if it's not a special police, not a commando, or a special force, the average police should come over. There are a dozen hostages inside, standing in rows, can't you see it outside? I'm still going to force it in. I can't understand such a design for the confrontation with the culprits in the later stage. It feels that such a bank hijacking case happened very crudely and crudely. There were no blasting experts, no negotiation experts, and nothing at all. There were only a few police officers driving police cars and some special police officers who rushed in. And at the beginning, the culprit was said to be so high IQ, so organized, disciplined, and even said that the firepower was very fierce. In the end, it turned out that they ran out with money on their backs. Just such a few gangsters were shot and killed by the police before they went far. So where did their IQ go? What is the role of those hostages? The hostages came out, the gangster came out to carry the money again, and then was killed, and it ended in a hurry. Should it be a bit planned? For example, it is more reasonable to ask for some vehicles or take the back aisle. It is so fair that he was killed without getting to the car with the money on his back. Really, anticlimactic. It's so easy to subdue the gangsters. What are the things that started? What is the use of starting those gun battles? And I read online reviews, and I keep saying that Nicholas Cage is paying off his debts. What kind of debts are he paying? Do you owe money to the film and television company? Can you make a bunch of bad movies to increase your income? I don't understand the reason for this, but if this movie is actually being shown, it will be shown in the cinema. The visibility is really not high. It is understandable if someone is watching it because of Nicholas Cage, but if it is really just to see the plot, it is really unnecessary. I think this kind of gunfight movie must first be creative, and secondly, you must have a plot. If you don't have these two, it can only be a bang bang bang. Whether it is a bandit hijacking a bank, a house-breaking house, a covert operation, or surrendering to the enemy and treason. There must be a main soul figure, who runs through the whole story, in fact, in the middle and the end. But although this person must be strong, his opponent must also be strong. Movies that match him are more exciting. Otherwise, he is completely one-sided, that is, he has a low IQ. The actor in this movie doesn't think that IQ is particularly high, but he's just being devoted to his duties. As for the opponent, that is, the gangster, the appearance is not really strong, but at the end, they become a group of no-brained gangsters. So at the beginning of this movie, his settings wanted to be very high, but there was no way to have a perfect ending. It's over in haste anyway Death, even if a good and righteous person dies in the middle, the final result is that justice defeats evil. This is the main purpose of the movie, and it is considered to be a complete meritorious service. Then this movie, if it’s for watching the male lead, you can still watch it, but if it's the plot, it's not interesting, but it's not that it's particularly boring, just watch it, it's nothing special.
View more about 211 reviews
