Oscars awarded to such a so-called "documentary" with too many one star?

Samara 2022-10-11 18:09:49

The “documentary” that was too bad to be bad was not shot from an objective and fair angle at all, and most of the content was shot. It is not ruled out that a small number of members are really saving the wounded, but an organization that floods the terrorists to rescue the wounded? Well, I didn't even choose the right actors. The film and this organization are both propaganda tools used by a few Western countries to discredit the Syrian government and Russia in order to achieve well-known goals. Winning an Oscar for such a film is a blasphemy of the award, and it also reveals that those countries are superficially just and awe-inspiring, but they have a hypocritical and dirty nature. Hundreds of years from the great nautical era to the present, the nature has not changed at all. It is not easy.

In fact, the media and individuals have always suspected the motives of the White Helmets organization. Over time, especially after the government forces seized their posing bases, the truth has come to light. They claimed that the government forces used poison gas, and even the United States, Britain and France indiscriminately bombed Syria, so that the Syrian people could enjoy the "happiness" of Western democracy. Not to mention that there is no basis for the countless inspections by international organizations. To say that it is hard to hear is when the rebel building is about to fall, they are not even qualified to eat poisonous gas. There are also poor acting skills such as fake injections and threats to the relatives of those being treated, which can be seen everywhere on the Internet. Those Western countries are far from some people, especially those who lead the way as they say they are so beautiful.

View more about The White Helmets reviews

Extended Reading

The White Helmets quotes

  • Mohammed Farah: Better to rescue a soul than to take one.