I didn't write a film review after watching it a few days ago. I was delayed for several days, and I was free today. As an action movie, the action is simple and neat, and the plot is compact, but there are some problems with the plot and values.
The first question is whether a person who has made a contribution to the country should be punished by the law if he breaks the law. I don’t think the laws of any country in the world say that I saved 100 people. After 1,000 people, I will never be arrested by the police. If this hole is opened, then you say that you saved the President, and it’s not illegal to get the warhead to kill people. Then I operated on the Prime Minister in the hospital and saved him. Is it okay if I am the power plant that sends electricity to the hospital? Counting that, do I count as a medical device?
So I want to say whose interests are in this film. Can you dare to say everywhere that you represent the interests of the country? Can anyone who contributes to the country do so? It's all just an excuse to escape the sanctions.
Everything has its price, even if you saved the earth a second ago, you should be punished for killing people this second. Samsung can't do more, looking angry.
View more about Hamilton: In the Interest of the Nation reviews
