Creativity is okay, but the ending process is terrible, so I was confused and didn’t explain anything at all. The last sentence is not as good as there is no. I saw that the film’s comments were basically three opinions, the first one. Everyone will disappear when they arrive in the hut. The second is that they disappear from the perspective of others, and the disappearance of others from their own perspective, and the third is that they psychologically think that they should disappear. I don’t think it makes any sense. The scholar girls have been there all the time, and all of them disappeared one by one when no one noticed. In the end, a group of people disappeared. The others did not leave everyone’s sight. Look at the previous content. This is unreasonable. When inspecting the wooden house according to the protagonist and a group of people, you can see a lot of traces left by the predecessors, such as hanging ropes, such as the words on the mirror, such as the words on the cabinet door? But the people who disappeared in the protagonist's group disappeared completely, and disappeared together with the traces left. This is a bug. Of course, it may be that I missed something. Then Charlotte obviously knows something, the hostess passes Charlotte seemed to be looking at something when the candle was lit. In the toilet, she told the other two people that I was leaving. She was being watched and disappeared. This is different from what was said, and Charlotte’s boyfriend disappeared. It is also very strange that the pistol disappeared with the key but left behind. Neither the car key nor the pistol belonged to him. Can the things disappear selectively? I thought about the result, but the more I thought it was, the more I thought it would make sense. In the end, if the heroine disappeared, I can speculate that: people who are not being looked at or not looking at others will disappear, but in the end the group of police officers outside disappeared, this It doesn't make any sense with the title and content. If other people disappear from one's own perspective, others disappear from one's own perspective. According to this statement, it is visual disappearance, which can be perceived through sound or touch. If it is not perceivable even with auditory touch, then non-biological information should be It is perceptible, such as the ringing of a telephone, but according to the film, the "existence" itself has completely disappeared. When the last two left, one said that he wanted to disappear and the other said that he didn't want to disappear, and finally the one who didn't want to disappear stayed. After disappearing, many people will have the idea that they want to disappear. This is normal. But who would have the idea of disappearing at the beginning of going out to play. I really hate this kind of thing. I don’t even give an explanation. If I think about it myself, it’s a bug, and I can’t connect it at all. Did the analysis emperor come to me to analyze and analyze, this kind of incomprehensibility feels so uncomfortable.
View more about Don't Blink reviews
