After reading it, I rubbed my sprained waist from the violent reversal ending. Except for the ubiquitous welding torch and the ubiquitous photography equipment, there was really no other impression left in my mind.
The shooting method of the pseudo-documentary is not flattering in this film, but it makes people even more disgusted and irritable when they are ruthlessly ruined by the botched plot full of loopholes.
I really want to say something, but there is a feeling that I don't know where to start because of too many slots.
1. Motivation: All serial crimes have a motive. If there is no motive, it is called manslaughter. The lads have proposed to marry him before starting the murder plan, which is not in line with the characteristics of a serial killer. I have never understood the motives of the murderer and the photographer for doing this? The clumsy stage acting and the editing techniques of playing ticket level? The extraordinary IQ for planning the whole loopholes plan? Or simply like to enjoy the pleasure and pleasure of killing? None of these answers can be found in the film. Their purpose may be to be an internet celebrity and to reserve two beds in the police station for the case.
2. Techniques: strange modus operandi. This homicide must have a welding torch. Note that this welding torch has a long tube and a heavy gas tank. I guess it is to create an impressive image of a homicide, similar to the chainsaw homicide, jtr, and Frye. Di, Jason, you must have a symbolic tool for committing crimes. This can be called a "welding gun homicide". The torch cuts hands and feet, and the torch grills a living person. I don’t know if this is feasible in reality. I have only seen pork sellers. Use a welding torch to burn less pig hair. I just want to say that compared with those classic images, this setting is exhausting. When chasing in the wild or in a cramped room, you have to carry this set of equipment, and when you fight with the victim, you have to drag a long foot. Guan, if it is not easy to play, maybe he will be killed by other victims. It is really not easy to consider the physical strength of the two girls. There are so many deadly objects in the world, I am surprised that the murderer chose such a troublesome symbolic weapon. Although in order to make up for the logical hole, the role of an old woman with money was arranged, which led to a nervous husband who was a soldier and was able to weld, and successfully misled the police. Is the old woman deliberately designed to let her get in the car as if it was the last one? I didn't introduce it, but even if it was planned, the murderer's IQ was almost fluctuating during the planning.
3. Police: The police perform best in the special police, and the group in the office is simply pigs. They saw the killer dragging the welding torch to kill the victim who was carrying the camera when he was overturning, running, or being chased, and was shot by a flare gun, and was still persevering when he fell to the ground. The murderer actually accepted this concept when facing up. I can only say that the IQ of the person in this film is really low. The kind of chase movie is in the first person, and you can imagine what a ridiculously beautiful picture it would be if you changed it to the third person. The female police officer slammed out the door every time she had a sign, either giving orders or holding a press conference, as if she could not do anything else, and it was normal to be tricked.
Fourth, the ending: the ending is extremely unreasonable. As a person with a certain amount of movie watching, I feel that the reversal means that the previous ending can explain the whole thing, but I faintly feel that something is wrong. It is only when it is reversed that all my doubts are dispelled. A good reversal plot is worth watching the movie repeatedly. To verify some details and small hints, and then compare the two endings, it is indeed more reasonable to reverse the ending. Therefore, the first premise of the reversal must also be in line with the plot, reasonable and reasonable. It cannot be forced to reverse for the reversal to fool the audience and show off. self. To be honest, when I saw that strong guy was the murderer, I guessed it would be reversed, because there are too many suspects, anyone can do it. But the reversal of this film is simple and rude to tell you that it was all bullshit before, and the hints of the real murderer are all taken out of context, and many things are even more unexplainable after not considering the revealing of the real murderer. Although this film wanted to take a new path and overthrow the basis of the whole reasoning, but sincerity and skill were completely unable to keep up. After the overthrow of the foundation, the original loopholes could not be filled, and more and larger pits were dug, and it was as devastated as the gas station. , Appalling.
When I saw the title of the film, I thought it would be a suspenseful film based on empirical analysis of logical fragments. It might even be the original story. However, this is a mysterious film. The murderer's editing techniques can even control the data damage of the digital device. This evidence can be regarded as the strongest perjury in history. Please don't be confused by the title. Friends who are looking forward to a logically rigorous suspense film can take a detour. This film does not have the hearty feeling of solving puzzles. After reading it, I feel that the line of the last girl is simply too terrible, such a bad film. There is also the ambition to make a sequel.
View more about Evidence reviews
