Every time you encounter this kind of bad science fiction movie, someone will always whitewash it, saying that it is just wearing the coat of science fiction, how rich the actual connotation is xxxx and so on. I just want to say, since you have decided to put on the coat of science fiction, can't you first study some basic science/technology? Can it be said that it is a literary film, can it conceal the fact that the crew is lazy and insincere?
I won't complain about using sand-produced water, because the spacecraft doesn't even have a backup system. It has been said that the spacecraft is a closed ecology. Could it be that the water in the spacecraft, including the water in his body, is circulated? I used cumbersome tools to repair the device, thinking I only knew how to shout at the screen when I lost contact. . . There are too many slots, right?
View more about Approaching the Unknown reviews
