I don’t know how to describe my mood after watching this movie. It took less than two hours to make a biography of this movie. It’s still too risky. The movie’s name is called Zola. Some are not worthy of the name, the film's biographical color is not strong.
The film was too pale. Although the director wanted to film how Zola, who was walking in front of the people, fought for the people and wanted to film a heroic story about saving France by writing, the character Zola was not portrayed in the film. success.
I don’t have too many thoughts. I hope that our country’s judicial system will be just like in the movie, uphold justice and speak out for ordinary people, and hope that there will be no more unjust cases. This is my good wish.
The plot is simple and smooth. When Zola came out, he was a poor writer. He was so arrogant that everyone was drunk and I was so alone. He lost his job as a bookstore clerk in order to write. Then he met a prostitute and relied on reading the diary written by the prostitute. He wrote a novel of the same name called Nana and he became famous.
Since then, our Mr. Zola has been on the road of criticizing the society, the army, and the government by writing his book. Then his books were very popular. He became rich and had a big belly. His good friend and great painter Cézanne disliked that he had forgotten his original ideals and left Paris and Zola.
Later, an officer was imprisoned unjustly. The whole country paid much attention to this case, but Mr. Zola didn't want to take care of it. Then a series of seemingly complicated, but actually very simple stories happened. In short, the Army decided to cover up the truth for its own honour and kept innocent officers in prison and unable to rehabilitate them. Then the officer’s wife found Zola, and Zola didn’t want to at first. No matter, he wants to live a good life in peace and stability. Then he suddenly saw the painting by Saishang, and he didn't know what he was thinking of, so he decided to rehabilitate the officer.
Although there are no logical errors or loopholes in the transition, the development of the whole plot is too abrupt, the story is not coherent, and the transition is very blunt. Later, on the long road to rehabilitate the officers, Army officers continued to put pressure on Zola. Both sides of the court expressed different opinions. Zola insisted on justice and the Army wanted honor. Then Zola didn't know why he lost the case.
Throughout the trial, the masses hated Zola, thinking that he was speaking for a traitor. I wondered Mr. Zola. How could you have so many readers and no one to support you? This is to highlight that Zola's expression is too deliberate and does not show a sense of reality. Zola lost the case, and then under the persuasion of his friends, he decided to go to London to hide, and he continued to write books and articles.
As a result, Zola continued to write books and articles in London. Now that he writes articles is useful? ? I don't know why the army suddenly decided to rehabilitate the officers. Maybe the situation could not be suppressed. There were some problems with the development of the whole plot. I think you have to say that you are working hard for the future of France. Zola is immortal. The plots of these films cannot express these sentimental tendencies. The film does not explain the role of Zola. The court debates in the film are more interesting. It’s not recommended to look at other things. The film uses a few things to make a great person. It is undoubtedly a failure. The description of Zola is too deliberate and pale. It may also be a problem with editing. The characterization is not full and symbolic. . Give five points.
View more about The Life of Emile Zola reviews
