first few identities switching, the same person but different identities and professions, people start to be curious about this woman. I wonder what kind of life experience makes her switch so much. In contrast, many people can only have fixed friends, fixed jobs, and fixed life circles. This formed a straightforward contrast.
The female protagonist did not go directly to the male protagonist, but chose to approach the work partner next to him in a roundabout way. The work partner is a mediocre-looking office worker, who is quickly attracted by the beauty and mystery of the heroine. There is an attraction to the hostess, and she knows her own charm very well. However, the way the heroine chooses to appear is too heavy and unnatural. It should be said that in the script, there are many places that look like patchwork on the whole.
Let’s talk about his core concept. The hostess has been looking for a high point. The really happy thing for her is the feeling of the master. She can't stand the back end of the parabola at all. As soon as she reaches a high point, she will immediately get away, and then find a new starting point for learning, experience and life. And she also let the male protagonist experience the feeling of switching identity. I believe the male protagonist understands the mood of the female protagonist, but in the end the male protagonist did not give an answer. It can be seen that the author is also a journey to write this script, and he did not. Answer. Artist are not supposed to give an answer.
The director and screenwriter of this movie are the same person. I don't think there are too many highlights on the screenwriter. The male lead and the female lead are the two contradictions of the screenwriter. On the screen of the movie, I think there is a way to see his thoughts. The transfer of a lot of feelings in this movie is very internal and subtle. On the one hand, it is very dependent on the physical expression of the actors. On the other hand, it is the language of the camera. Many close-up facial close-ups completely isolate any surrounding environment. The background is blurred in a large area and the compact focus makes the audience and the actor have a sense of oppressive intimacy. . There are many shots that don’t seem to be standard. To be honest, I don’t know if this film is not shot in this way, can it convey that very inner feel.
But my favorite part of the whole movie is the frog shot. At this time, the privilege of the lens is fully displayed. The lens is the human eye, but it can go where people can't go for people. Looking at it at such a close distance, coupled with the high-quality sound, the presence is extremely strong. Of course, I still have no way to fully understand the purpose of his filming, but it can be guessed that the frog that the hostess was used as a social talker in the dinner was real. In the bar, everyone questioned whether she was lying to everyone, she was embarrassed. Situation. Frog is a symbol or an indirect description thing throughout, but this thing becomes a symbol that reminds us of the atmosphere of the place where the symbol appears and the various experiences of the protagonist. All were released in the frog's call.
This story can be considered small-scale, but the structure is not small, and the discussion is very internal. Identity is more like a trap for the female protagonist, but she also likes the commitment itself, or as described by the male protagonist, the female protagonist has never changed. She is still the little girl who is crazy about the piano. The story itself didn't particularly appeal to me, but the sense of distance that the film language itself can make me feel makes me enjoy.
View more about Complete Unknown reviews
