Digging professional households

Darron 2022-10-16 17:32:47

This is Hitchcock's movie guide. Truffaut is just an introduction. In fact, many other famous directors' roles appear in it. To be honest, the understanding of Hitchcock has always remained only with the master of suspense films. After the literacy of this film, he realized that as a craftsman of audio-visual communication, Hitchcock has many basic skills such as audio-visual image viewing and many other film techniques. It’s obsessive-compulsive disorder and demanding to understand what is called a textbook movie.
What’s interesting is that Hitchcock is a master of Hollywood suspense films, and Truffaut is a famous French new wave pioneer director. The other directors appearing in this film actually basically combine these two schools, including Scorsese, Vinci, and Anderson. Waiting for mainstream film directors who have a good grasp in the commercial and artistic fields, there are new wave successors such as Desprichin and Assayas. Hitchcock has always been precise in the structure and neatness of the image. The New Wave style has always been out of all the patterns that appear. These are almost two divergent movie concepts. In fact, they appreciate each other and learn from each other. I even thought about whether it could be expressed in a more open way. These are quite touching, pure communication and learning instead of the Momin's tearing battle that can be seen everywhere today.
Hitchcock’s works are actually not seen much. The butterfly dream that I have the deepest personal impression of, what rebecca looks like is something I have always been worried about when I was a child. This is really Hitchcock’s pit. Suddenly I wanted to see the "extremely abnormal" "Victoria" in Vinci's mouth, hehehehe.

View more about Hitchcock/Truffaut reviews

Extended Reading

Hitchcock/Truffaut quotes

  • Martin Scorsese: [Discussing "Psycho"] At that time, as it is now, we expect certain things. And it took storytelling at that time and said, "No, I'm not going to give you that. I'm going to give you something else. Because you think everything is so cool. You're at the end of the 50s, the 60s are going to look glorious to us." I think it was really important for who we were then. You have Vietnam. You have border revolution. You have everything that happened in the 60s. and the society has never been the same. That picture really touched upon that, I think, "Psycho". Of course, you want everything so neat and wrapped up. Well, life isn't like that.

  • Alfred Hitchcock: [Discussing "Psycho"] My main satisfaction is that film did something to an audience. I really mean that. In many ways, I feel my satisfaction in our art achieved something, often, mass emotion. It wasn't a message. It wasn't some more great performance. It wasn't a highly, appreciated novel that served the audience. It was pure film. People will say what a terrible thing to make and the subject was horrible. The people were small. There were no characters in it. I know all this. But, I know one thing: the use of filming construction of this story caused audiences all over the world to react and become emotional.