British persisted to the victory of the two wars and the Cold War. The British royal family as a country and tradition It is a symbol of dedication and dedication and won the respect and love of the people. In reality, Britain’s economic difficulties and pressure from the Cold War for decades after World War II, people’s livelihood dying and deep exhaustion. The public’s dissatisfaction has never been directed at the royal family. The
Windsor royal family, as an ancient royal family, takes the initiative in modern society Comprehend and follow the will of the people, rationally follow the status within the scope of habit, instead of seeking the actual power possessed by law, and insist on the responsibilities of oneself although it is symbolic and ceremonial. Especially with Russia, Germany, Austro-Hungary, and Ottoman In contrast to the bloody destruction of traditional royal empires such as the Qing Dynasty, the king of the United Kingdom has retreated to a neutral position and is wise and appropriate.
Facing subversive challenges and comprehensive changes, the ancient nation and traditions deal with the division of social classes, communication and mobility are the key Where. Although the British Empire is dwindling, but the afterglow is still there. The past and present of the British royal family provide a sample of successful social change.
American Lionsgate Films. Americans like to shoot modern British royal comedies, and they have young people in their impressions. Victoria/King’s Speech/Princess Night Tour/Queen. Britain’s deep-rooted hierarchical concept, there are realistic and people-friendly documentaries about the royal family, and it will not joking about the royal family. The
roles of the king and the two princesses are consistent with the personalities of the real people. The king Stuttering is gentle and gentle, the queen is elegant and wise and pays attention to etiquette, the queen is staid and responsible, and the second princess is ignorant of enjoyment. On the contrary, the accent and behavior of the civilian hero are too elegant, and the image of the tired war hero is too ideal.
The film attempts to outline the panorama: the ruined civilian homes under the background of the victory carnival, the pervasive underworld black market, and the political instability to the left are all expressed; the shots range from Buckingham Palace, Regent Hotel, Trafalgar Square, London Bridge to the slums. Lane, the camera sweeps across London.
Unfortunately, the film is sincere, but it can’t make a deep impression. It feels like underexposure, insufficient color contrast, blurry focus, lack of layers and details.
In short, the script is cute and interesting, excellent Actor, history is restored well, but photography and editing are very mediocre.
View more about A Royal Night Out reviews
