One of the laws of nature is balance, which should be good. Any creatures in nature have various relationships with other creatures or creatures. Except for the confrontational relationship between predator and prey, the only relationship of cooperation is symbiosis and parasitism. Many people should think that parasitism is not a cooperative relationship. Biologically speaking, parasitism really does not belong to cooperation, because parasites just squeeze out the nutrients of the host blindly, and will not bring any benefits to the host. It is definitely not a mutually beneficial and win-win cooperation relationship. But the reason why we come to this conclusion is that we look at the problem of parasites from the perspective of the so-called God. If Cuscuta and Geranium could talk, what would they think of their relationship with each other? The plot and character of this movie are very simple and even the old-fashioned little movie "Breathe". It seems to be just another girl-to-girl drama, but it has explored some very profound issues in two ways. Two girls with very different personalities and family backgrounds, from the rapid warming of friendship to the rapid freezing of tears, to the final outbreak, the audience stood in C’s perspective and clearly saw C’s mental journey, so they would inevitably be C has a lot of sympathy, and even when C kills S eventually, many people may feel that it is very happy, and they will not think how extreme C's approach is. Even if it is, it is forced by S. Of course, when we go to study this movie in detail, it is not difficult to find that S is not as abhorrent as imagined, and C can't be said to be a white lotus. The reason why we revised our previous conclusion is naturally because we changed our perspective. From the perspective of S, she naturally has her own problems, and C has many mistakes. However, the thinking caused by this movie should not only be the necessity of perspective conversion, but also the possibility of perspective conversion in the true sense. We often talk about empathy, but we all know that empathy in the true sense never exists, and the lack of perspective lies in the absence of this possibility. Even in the case where we are only the third party to a certain event, where we may be able to see this event through the perspective of God, is the perspective of God that we are supposed to be the whole truth of the event? People are not gods, even if you think you have participated in the observation of an event throughout, it does not mean that you must have paid attention to all the details of the event, or even many key details. In fact, this is also impossible. The gap between human beings and perfection allows everyone to have their own rhetoric, distinguishing their own roles from others. This kind of role distinction is obviously not meaningless, but it is also obviously not the answer to the contradiction between people, but the source of the contradiction between people. Someone has said that the truth has deteriorated at the moment it is produced, because the truth is relative to humans, and the content of the human brain cannot be filtered without being filtered, and the truth made by natural humans is not in the true sense at all. The truth is out. That being the case, the so-called harm, the so-called victim, and the so-called innocence are nothing more than justify the identity tag of a person for oneself, and it does not indicate any problem. And the rhetoric of changing perspectives is the opposite of showing that there is no real objectiveness in the world, nothing more than sometimes what we call "objective" sees more than "subjective", but the extra content does not make "objective" greater than "subjective" "The really reasonable reason." Of course, such a statement seems very relativistic, and a world without standards is obviously dangerous, but we must also see that there are many doubtful contents in the so-called standards. In the final analysis, the fundamental reason why we comply with a certain standard is not because we feel that the standard is right. In fact, it is just because it is useful to comply with the standard, even though we usually think that we are doing what we think is right. thing. To understand the meaning of things in this way is not to become an extreme skeptic, nor to become a relativist, but to understand that one of the most important laws of nature is balance, and the world is the most perfect. The balance is created by the most extreme extreme, and the end of all things must be balance. This kind of balance is not good or bad, it is just like breathing, it is an established reality that cannot be changed.
View more about Breathe reviews
