There is a detail. Following the spider that Stokery crawled into the thigh, there appeared the second spider that came to Mia—the spider crawling out of the dusty hydrangea. I don’t know where it is. Are spiders longing for the awakening of lust like what the great gods said before? After all, there are too many metaphors of this. Especially, the first shot after the wedding night is the spider web with dew in the woods in the morning, combined with the original work, It’s easy for me to think about it...marriage, husband, disappointed... The
director captures the characteristics of Mia's character who is particularly good at talking less (of course, it is better to fit the word). But,,, may I ask you Is it possible to shoot like this? I like Mia very much, and I watch this movie because of Mia. She is very aura, and her performance is very natural. She is not pretentious at all, and it is easy for everyone to get into the mood of the character. But everyone is reading The original, charming, mindless Emma is not the puffy, taciturn frowning girl in front of us. Although Mia’s Jane Eyre is also criticized (I think it’s pretty good, I really don’t I think Joan Fondon’s Jane Eyre is suitable, and the timid, weak and unreliable character image is Joan’s best play), but I think Jane Eyre’s stubborn and intelligent Mia is still performing well. But let her play Bovary Madam, I’m just taking a fresh look. Everyone can guess
that it’s not convincing. I understand the reasons why people are not optimistic and have low scores, and choose the roles. There is also a long, long-winded section above. But the movie itself is not without Regrettably, the director is a person who knows how to use the camera. Many things that need to be explained are in the camera. This kind of profound meaning, if you want to know it, you can learn more...^/^.
Having said this, I want to add another sentence. Why are there so many similar novels at that time? It's because there are always keen people who perceive what everyone is accustomed to. What we are now insensitive may become the source of classic works in many years. But to be honest, most of the classic sources are somewhat similar, because regardless of the old and new civilizations, these problems seem to have not been solved at all. Mrs. Bovary, Mrs. Karenina, Mrs. Matilda... Innocent women are mostly emotional and dependent, always longing for love. But to paraphrase someone else's words, it is purely the privilege of boys and girls, and most pure women will never get rid of the ending of being played by or following the men.
In general, I don't think this is a superficial work of illusion, but it is still far from the classics.
View more about Madame Bovary reviews
