The beginning of the movie feels like "Sniper Phone Booth", confined space, low-cost production, the lead actor is alone to complete the whole process from the inattention to the intense tension in the middle to the final personality sublimation, the whole process is forced to split the personality of the lead actor. I have been looking for life and death in order to be self-disciplined~ After watching the first ten minutes of the film, my vision for the film is "Hollywood": the anchor tried his best to turn the tide, and the president appeared sincerely apologized as a savior and confessor, and it was terrifying. The elements were apologized and put down the butcher knife and captured. The police arrested the terrorists and brought them to justice. The hostages were saved and turned into peace. . What a typical heroic American suspense movie~~
But the Koreans don’t do that. Nothing in the ending is consistent with my assumptions. It can be said that it’s irrelevant: the anchor (played by Ha Jung Woo) is undoubtedly the soul of the film and will be broadcast live throughout. The method interprets the curtain call of a gorgeous life from a terrorist attack on the sidelines to nowhere to stand in it. His agency was as clever as possible, but it still couldn’t escape the tragic fate of being the mouthpiece of a centralized ruler. He experienced threats by terrorists, betrayed by colleagues and bosses, banished by authorities, and so-called criminals in just one day. The dramatic spiritual impact before shooting and killing, and finally facing the separation from his lover, the police who came to arrest or even shoot him, his choice can be imagined. The bombs left behind by the criminals are played in the human rights and human rights. The ultimate swan song of the "ideal of dignity" is also the loss of both sides after the light fell in love with the dark. A line that appears repeatedly in the film is said by the anchor and the criminal respectively: "Isn't it over for an apology?" "Is it so difficult for him to apologize?" In a centralized society, the authorities will treat themselves for themselves. Do the people apologize for their indifference and trampling on life? The interpretation at the end of the film is too real. The reply of those in power is always to say something innocent but righteous after the blood is poured out and life is gone, to comfort the unknowing people, but there is nothing else. In the place shown in the film, there is no justice and no evil, only a compromise between benefits and concessions, and only endless climbing, but there is also a good man, the anchor’s ex-wife, who has worked hard for truth and conscience, but the final result is cold. Death, behind the stretcher carrying her corpse, the jungle-like mansions reflected the high above the group of insensitive helms.
If the director of "No Man’s Land" I watched a few days ago squeezed his brains to innovate, then the director of this movie today is desperately trying to restore the reality of the world, but our people don’t need to know so much. Director, you talk too much. . .
View more about The Terror Live reviews
