It is foolish to use stories and metaphors to try to understand and connect Godard’s films.

Don't try to use all kinds of metaphors and stories to link this movie together, just pretend to be compelling. Disassemble the movie into images and sound to see, this is the key. Decompose them all and combine them again. This film has the same things as other Godard movies, so I won’t say much about it (suddenly loud music, crows cry, movie history things, fragments of World War II documentaries, which have appeared in his movies many times), new There are a lot of tilted shots, no tripod shots, most of the dog shots (that should have been raised by him) (dogs have appeared in his movies before, but this time they accounted for one-third of the whole film. Lens), and a few moving shots that are superimposed (very wonderful). Generally, the superimposition has a primary and secondary effect, and it is completely superimposed on one surface. It is inevitable that the eyes will be tired after an hour and a half.
There is also the woman behind the iron as a promotional poster. This should be related to the pickpocket of Robert Blesson (Godard has a high opinion of him). That is the last classic picture.
Godard's voice appeared twice, old and trembling. After the woman talked about death, it was probably a metaphor. The one in front of his house also appeared three times, from three different shootings, the last time it was snowing, and then passing a car.
The color of the picture is even more unscrupulous (there are pictures like this for a few minutes behind the Film Socialism and Love Research Institute), and this time it also accounts for one-third. I mean to mess up the contrast and brightness of the picture. This is the separation of colors.
Like movie socialism, it uses cameras of different levels to shoot, including mini sony, canon, and high-definition digital cameras. This is very important. Godard has always dared to experiment and change in the choice of cameras in order to present the pictures taken by a variety of cameras. The difference is that most of the movie Socialism was shot with digital cameras, this time each accounted for an even part. It feels like he has no scruples and found a good investment after winning the last time.
There are also a lot of bright red, blood, words, and red scarves. This has not changed. There are all kinds of sounds, the music is Mozart and so on used before, and the end of the movie is a harsh baby call. Various sounds change in different channels (5.1 was used since the beginning of film socialism).
In my case, there is actually nothing new, this is his thing. The audience understands the sound of the music at the beginning and the bright red AH is superimposed on dieu, but he found a more direct way and freer investment. Congratulations he.

View more about Goodbye to Language reviews