Because this movie is not only bloody, violent, and pornographic, it also dared to shake the law and promote revenge. This is openly fighting the law and competing with XX. I guess the people in the General Administration must think so.
On the surface, what the movie shows is similar to what they worry about, but if you think the director of this movie is so superficial, then you are wrong. The director wants to express something very deep. This kind of thing may be extreme and violates the law, but it guarantees the fairness and stability of the society to a certain extent.
This thing is human instinct, it is called hatred. The three rich second generations who committed rape, bought a girl for perjury, and bought a forensic doctor who sold their morals for money, thus escaping the sanctions of the law, but in the end they did not escape the hatred.
The movie did not show how the three rich second generations died tragically, but the death of the girl who gave false testimony must be very miserable. As for the protagonist, Jiang Minho, his ending can no longer be described as miserable. To describe it in one sentence, it is "killing and punishing the heart". To kill is to punish the heart, and it is a hundred times more painful than death. He did commit a crime before, but the crime he committed could not be repaid with such a price, and the punishment was excessive.
The following is the key point I want to say. I don’t know if there are judges, lawyers, forensic doctors, etc. in China who have watched this movie. I don’t know what they will think after watching it. I believe that there are not a few unjust, false and wrongly filed cases in our country, and will anyone hold hatred in their hearts.
To repeat what I just said, hatred is human instinct. If everyone has hatred in their hearts, will the cost of crime be high (such as the protagonist of the film).
A person commits a crime and is punished by the law. This is a normal result. But if the offender escapes legal sanctions through power or money, the situation can be complicated. It is possible that he will remain at large in the future. But don’t forget that everyone and every victim has a social relationship. It may be a relative, a friend, a teacher or a student, or a lover. Each of them is likely to plant the seed of hatred, which will take root and germinate, and finally will blossom and bear fruit. Guess who will eat this bitter fruit in the end.
The perpetrator's violating the law is likely to be a good ending for the perpetrator, because the law is at least fair, and will not kill or be implicated. But if you bypass the law, it's hard to say what you will face. Because things like revenge are primitive, cruel, and have no moral bottom line. Compared with it, the judgment of the law is more lovely.
The protagonist of the film once helped the offender to get rid of crimes, and he himself did not accept legal sanctions for the actions he committed, but his final fate was so miserable that it really made people sweat behind his back. I was thinking that this movie probably wanted to be a wake-up call to tell those people that the cost of crime is very high, and for the sake of yourself and your family, don't do those things. Even if you have the ability to evade legal sanctions, you will never be able to get rid of one thing, hatred!
View more about No Mercy reviews
