We transferred part of our rights, formed a government, and gave it public rights, but it did not develop exactly as we wanted. The government is also selfish. It sacrifices our interests and deceives us in its own interests and under the control of very few elites in society. In order to protect its own status, it abandons human rights and justice. It goes against our original intentions and the morality of human society. Bottom line. Every government has its own secrets, but when such secrets conflict with the ethics and morals of human society, do such secrets need to be made public? Still keep secrets just to protect the government. When facing these secrets, do we choose to support the government or for humanity? What is truly patriotic, and how can the conflicts be resolved? Do we have the right to protect these secrets that contradict the interests of mankind?
The secret of the government is to control. But is the human society for the existence of the 20% elite? Or is it that only by sacrificing the interests of those ignorant people can progress be made?
From what stand should we look at this issue?
Perhaps WikiLeaks is just a private remedy for human rights and a confrontation against the abuse of public power.
But how to define the bottom line of secrets?
How to go to trial?
Perhaps, it will never be possible to define the bottom line of the secret!
View more about
We Steal Secrets reviews
