Wajda said that this was a real thing, and it was put on the screen. What actually happened is not necessarily a good movie if it is made into a movie. These plots are indeed shocking. But it doesn’t have to be a good work of art. It is accompanied by the sensational effect of real materials, but it is not told in a meaningful way. It and Nanuk's authenticity are at two extremes. This movie did a lot of things, arranged the sequence of events, decorated plots around real events, and reserved the audience’s surprise until the last moment. Nanuk only did one thing, put the camera rack next to him and began to shoot continuously. The aesthetic or moral evaluation (or Bazin’s evaluation for me) is still higher in the latter. The former is decorative; the latter is essential.
I think the plot of "I love Jacek" is designed. The two pairs of men and women in it are allegorical, a strong man (superficially strong) and an innocent girl; a clean man and a strong and dirty girl. woman. Many people understand the film as a fable. In my opinion, this is a success or a failure. Vajda always does his symbolism in some plots, using the fidelity of the details to catch you and say what he wants to say.
I admit that when the two of JACIEK saw the light and kissed and saw the blocked exit, my blood was cold. Several times I thought it was over, and the recorder had several choices for self-protection. KADR shot him when he got out of the ground, then climbed back to the sewer to end
View more about
Kanal reviews
