Reflection, against your sister

Colten 2022-01-23 08:05:07

Check out a few disgusting comments below.
"It is necessary to reflect on the civil war, reflect on the "Korean War"."-As if it had suffered a lot.
Do you think carefully about who doesn't understand, dissatisfied with the current society, what innuendo acidic water is playing. I persuade a few people to speak directly if they are dissatisfied, go to the streets if they are dissatisfied, go to the streets if they are unhappy, or on Weibo if they are not on the streets, and don't use history and movies to show their ignorance.

To those guys who have been inspired by the "Republic of China Fan" after reading a few rubbish books or a few rubbish web articles, I said you should read more and don't take things that the Kuomintang itself is embarrassed to mention as treasures.

The Kuomintang has been in Taiwan until it relied on its previous political power, a huge army, and residual financial resources to show such a poor political ability. With such a broken organization, do you expect it to rule the mainland well?

Realistic dissatisfaction, please tell reality, don't use your distorted dissatisfaction to distort history. Don’t be like the failed democratic parties that opposed Chiang but were easily bought off. They opposed the Communist Party but feared its force. He lacked the ability to even go to the streets, and was full of complaints until he died.

Reflect, reflect on your sister, read some books when you have time, and reflect on your own outlook on life.




There is an article about the Korean War.

Briefly talk about the Korean War. The key point is that that era was fist talking! [Wombat] On:2009-01-31 02:58:16

Why can the Soviet Union be on par with the United States after World War II? Because the two sides are similar in military terms. Why is it that many people are not convinced that France became the occupying power after Germany surrendered? Because the recovery of France was fought by the Allied forces, the French did not do much on their own. Why did China participate in so many spoil-sharing activities after World War II? Because during World War II, China and Japan fought a lot of bloody battles. In the eyes of others, you are more or less a human being. Otherwise, can China become the five permanent members of the United Nations? Even if it is people’s abacus that allows you to contain Japan, you must have the capital to contain Japan.

In those days, what kind of money and wealth were all imaginary. If you don't want to protect the inpatients, the robbers will rob them all. You save as much as you save for others. Those of us who grew up in peaceful times couldn't imagine that kind of brutal posture.

To be fair, the Korean War greatly enhanced our international status. Some even commented that after the Korean War, China became the third largest power after the United States and the Soviet Union. In the age of fist-speaking, if we lost the Korean War, China would be nothing more than the second India. Not many people really take you seriously. In peace times, this international status is nothing more than to decorate the facade. There is dignity when there is money. If you are rich, everyone will treat you as an ancestor. But in the era of crisis-ridden smoke. Money means nothing more than war, and you have money to buy weapons. With international status, you are still a participant in various international transactions. Without international status, you are the traded goods of various international transactions. For practical examples, see the Munich Conspiracy. Look at the fate of the Czech Republic.

Mao spent all his money to bet on the Korean War. The price was heavy, but the international status was also salvaged. This intangible asset has brought us benefits for decades. Without the victory of the Korean War, the Soviet Union would not help us build a complete industrial system, and without the victory of the Korean War, the United States would not come over to win you over after turning against the Soviet Union. We didn't get so many benefits in the 1980s.

Don't imagine how we would have been if we followed the United States in the first place. Then the next step is to compare Korea, Taiwan, etc. to imagine the future. To put it bluntly, people who think so are visionaries. Given the size of China, no one is willing to help us unsuspectingly. To really compare, one has to refer to India.

Read information about international relations in Germany. Information about China only began to increase after World War II. Few people paid attention to what happened in China before, and relatively few mentions of China were mentioned in the chapters of World War II. But after the Korean War, just mention Asia, especially East Asia and Southeast Asia. The shadow of China is everywhere. In the library that day, reading Bernd Stoever's history of the Cold War. After the chapter of the Korean War, it was China: Eine dritte Weltmacht entsteht.

The dignity of a country is wealth and strength. Although in the years of war and peace, there will be different priorities, but both are indispensable. In that era of fist talk, our volunteer army proved our inviolability under extremely difficult circumstances. In fact, it is also harsh to accuse Mao of militant soldiers in that era. In those days, some people dared to say that peace was the main theme of the world and was a joke. How long was the interval between the First World War and the Second World War? How long did our Anti-Japanese War last? How long was the interval between the Anti-Japanese War and the Civil War? The United States and the Soviet Union have sharpened their knives. How many times have the world almost reached World War III?

It's naive to practice only internal strength blindly, especially in that era when the guns are full of smoke. Of course, blindly practicing external skills is a cruel weapon, and the consequences are also disastrous. In the Korean War, we had gains and losses. All kinds of influences are hard to describe in one word. If we don't fight, we are India. If we lose, we are not as good as India.

ps: If you want to discuss international issues, you must look at the world, not just at home.

View more about The Front Line reviews