The good writing of the play, the people in the play do not cry, the outsiders cry. Here are the people in the play laughing and the outsiders crying. Of course, we can learn from our eyes, and of course it's because of our lack of acting skills. Oh, how can it be so, it's simply anxious.
I have always wanted to watch the film in a calm mood. Whether it's the beginning of the film, or the deliberately created bridge, as well as the conversations with unclear meanings and overly abrupt quarrels, they are all seen in the eyes. I have to say that I am used to finding others. The fault of the play makes it difficult to enter the play. Fortunately, the visual center has been walking around the missing master, and everything else is relatively weakened in his mind.
BC alone surpassed the quality of the film itself. Those beautiful shots, without him, there would be less beauty. Although he was not handsome at first glance, he couldn't move away after a few more glances. The others were thoroughly compared.
Probably it is preconceived to pay attention to him, every move makes people thoroughly involved, maybe this will blur our judgment on the quality of acting, but so concerned about the emotions of a certain role, so in-depth want to experience the character’s temperament, since After "Let Me Go", I didn't feel much. Compared with the "Queen" that was just completed today, let me say that although Grandma Helen won the best actress with that movie, she would still be compared to BC. I hope this is not because my eyes are blinded by obsession... Generally speaking, I don't know how to do it, and maybe I will start to make exceptions when I encounter a missing master.
Similar films, such as "Etudes", although they are also beautiful, they always lack acting skills. Only the Taiwanese freshness is left, and the bright eyes are far from touching.
From the perspective of the film itself, the script of "Etude" is actually more solid, more grounded, richer and more readable than the film. However, the idol actor is not as good as the British empire practiced by Shakespeare. Men. With these actors, British cinema will certainly not decline. With actors like Que Ye, Xiao Qingxin also has an extraordinary depth of philosophy, and Xiao Qingxin has penetrated into his human nature.
I don’t understand the reason why I’ve been looking for a bad guy to play the opposite role. Although he’s really good, even impressed...Just like when we watched AR as a professor, he played so well, even if he is not the hardest half-blood prince, he will turn around. Love him to death.
The positive role Wei Ye got was actually quite good. There was a report before that he lacked luck. Can someone who is unlucky get a role like Hawking, Van Gogh, James, Xia Fu and Gillham? Knowing that he is only in his thirties, he has already touched so many people. Although he occasionally beats soy sauce, he is extremely dazzling.
I was very happy that he didn't have a handsome face, which blocked how much irrational worship.
Of course, the role of Xia Fu is calculated separately, and indeed a lot of worship has been found. Of course, it is difficult to say whether it is irrational or not~ That purely earned our incomparable worship and corruption, and successfully replaced all the images of the predecessor Xia Fu. This is very rare...very rare, unparalleled transcendence.
Speaking of Xia Fu again, it must not be said. Although the acting skills are good, the lack of a master is like being born for Xia Fu's reincarnation. The combination of amazing professionalism and childish cuteness, clever mind and unworldly eyes, he was born in Harrow College, how he lived through the strict and terrible era and retained this incomparable nature, this is the most mysterious and charming.
——————————————————————————
BC’s learning AR sound on TV is too cute and too amazing! In any case, his acting skills saved this script that would be directly rejected by our instructor, and he should indeed have a better stage.
View more about Third Star reviews
