1. Chen Shaobai has a gun in his hand. If there are too many killers in the front, and they can't kill them with one shot, why not shoot when there is only one big villain, Hu Jun? Many people died in vain, especially Chongguang. Of course, after the gun was given a heavy light, he was scared... but there was no reason to let him sit in the rickshaw and run forward. Didn't anyone think that he could stop and use the gun? It is possible to cause death without dying, which is deliberately creating a sense of tragedy.
2. Shen Chongyang, a gambling policeman played by Donnie Yen, brought the last bit of sane before he died, hit a fierce horse, and died... He threw a bench or a blade at that time, and he would make him run at a high speed. Lima was frightened, and the effect was not worse than that of a collision with his body. I have thought about it, how could he not think of it as a master of martial arts. Or: He is desperate to die... It is not necessary to sprinkle blood like this, which is also deliberately creating a sense of tragedy.
3. If the story itself is good, there is no need to use the All-Star lineup. To use a big star, the director must "live in town", otherwise it is not Chen Shaobai and Fang Hong who run full of screens, but Liang Jiahui and Li Yuchun. It is not a good thing for the audience to play too easily. I don’t understand the director’s use of an all-star lineup. Of course, thinking that it is a commercial blockbuster after all, it is understandable with its box office considerations. When Li Yuchun came out, there was always laughter in the court. I think she is very cute. On the eve of the decisive battle, she mixed with a group of men to eat and drink to prepare, and the atmosphere was right. If there must be a woman, it should be her. Imagine putting a Fan Bingbing among these men, and the atmosphere is not right.
4. The film was shot too tightly and did not relax. The opening paragraph talks about assassination and creates a horrible atmosphere, which is similar to the opening paragraph of "Wind Sound", but the film language is not as good as "Wind Sound". But its intention is high, and the composite index still exceeds the wind.
5. In fact, I was quite worried when watching a movie. Later, I wondered why I was worried, not Li Yuchun, not Donnie Yen, they all know martial arts in the movie, and they have their own clear purpose. It is those friends of Ah Si, Ah Si is a minion, and his friends are also coolies, "They will also join tomorrow, they run faster than me." Ah Si and his friends don’t know if they are going to die tomorrow. . Ah Si is because the master proposed for him, which is considered to be love. But what about his friends? The first group of assassins attacked, and the martial arts fighters came forward to fight, and these coolies shouted: carrying rice bags. Their only barrier is the rice bag they usually carry, underneath is the body of flesh and blood. They died very quickly. At that time, I was in the play, and I thought to myself, run, run. They don't even know to protect anyone, nor do they do it out of doctrine. They are the truth of most revolutions: the first to die is always a group of little people who don't know anything and don't even have a name. Even in the movie, they didn't give them a name or place of origin.
6. I was also very worried when the monk who ran out of Shaolin Temple died. At that time, I didn't know that he was Battelle and also a star. ——If this movie is not for so many stars now, find some ordinary-looking people to play these little characters, the effect may be more moving.
7, The beggar Liu Gongzi and the hitting woman Fang Hong, the play is relatively rough, not as good as Ah Si and Shaolin monk. The latter two interact with other people. They are branches and leaves that branch naturally from a tree. Gongzi Liu's life experience: the woman who fell in love with her father, the father and the woman died, leaving him as dead and single-minded. Please die... This is just the roughest definition of a character's identity. What about the details? hardly. Shaolin monk, there is another detail about "love flowers and plants". He is an individual, how could there be no details? There are many such little characters in Stephen Chow’s "Kung Fu", but if you think about it, how plump the charterer and the charterer are, even if it is the three supporting roles of the tailor, the noodle shop owner, and the coolie, which one does not have his own personal details, even theirs The kung fu is different: the tailor fights exquisitely, making Hong's iron thread fist, punching the fist fiercely, and squeezing the fist, a tailor with a gay tendency; the noodle shop owner uses a stick to roll his face all day long, and he is good at using Goro's Bagua sticks. Coolie is strong and straightforward, and his kung fu is also full of twelve-way tan legs. ... In the fighting scene in the October siege, only Donnie Yen was chased and killed by the villain’s second master, one scene worthy of praise, chasing in the busy city, crossing people and things, like entering the land of no one, the scene is light and beautiful, full Shows Yen Zidan's kung fu cultivation.
8. "If you want the happiness of civilization, you have to go through the pain of civilization. This pain is called a revolution."-I said, this movie is better than a high ambition. And the director knows very well that he is only using Sun Yat-sen to film the stories of a few small characters. This is clear and helpful. He didn't sublimate blindly, just click and stop. "If you want the happiness of civilization, you have to go through the pain of civilization. This pain is called a revolution." It is the crowning sentence of the film and its intention. But for a country that has experienced the Revolution of 1911, the National Government, and the People’s Republic of China As far as the audience is concerned, how could I not think about things "after the revolution", and the result of thinking is fruitless.
Lu Xun experienced the Revolution of 1911 and the disillusionment after the revolution. Before his death, he turned to the left. He was a reformer who always believed in the "future". He did give most of his energy and life to people and people who he believed to be progress. Matter, but he also doubts what the "future" actually has. He said, “Revolution has blood and filth, but there are babies. This baby is just a drop of blood before the birth, and it is a big lesson given to modern people by actual fighters. Although there is coldness and vacillation, it is even because of dependence and instinct. , And everyone is still moving towards the goal. Even if the future is finally'death', this'death' has lost its personal significance and is integrated with the public."-This passage is a bit similar to what Sun Wen said in the movie , But there is an additional layer of self-doubt. This is the point of self-doubt. There is no such thing as the finishing touch of the movie. But I can’t help but wonder, those coolies who don’t know why they died, the Shaolin monk who only knew that they came to beat bad people, the A Si who thought he could marry Ah Chun after tomorrow... these innocent little people, for them Is it worth it to die for this revolution without understanding? In magnification, what kind of revolution can justly sacrifice human life and claim that "this pain is called a revolution"? Haven't we experienced such a revolution? Don’t we live in the aftermath of this revolution? Is it worth it? That being the case, why are we so easily moved by such words? Hearing this, we shouldn’t think about it. Is there another way? At least ask ourselves, is it worth it? Since facing so many killings and deaths, such a rhetorical question is not superfluous, even if the answer is unsolvable.
9. There are too many killings in the movie. It's uncomfortable after reading it.
View more about Bodyguards and Assassins reviews