"Gone with the Wind" should be the most fragmented and inexplicable one of his several works I have seen. Fortunately, I have never "looked at the film well without seeking detailed explanations", and the poor translation and fragmented plots did not affect my reading. Get relish.
The first thing that was attracted was of course the Greek countryside in the yellow land. I don't think the director has much beautification, the main reason is the ubiquitous dust. Whether it's the white houses or the villagers coming and going, they are all shrouded in dust, not the pure and elegant taste of oil paintings. The fragmented life scenes gave me an inexplicable sense of intimacy. Those with no ups and downs and the daily repeated dialogues draw the viewer and the object closely.
In fact, I don't like to pull out some truths and concepts from a film, but let my Hamlet and your Hamlet meet and exchange ideas. There may be an argument. Sometimes it is interesting.
As usual, the plot can be said in one sentence: an engineer and his colleagues came to a small village and lived in calm and calm for two weeks. The story ends here. We don’t know why they came, we don’t know what he was thinking when wandering in the village, who he was calling, or whether he achieved the purpose of his trip in the end. The movie is full of vague factors, concealing the message of death and the power of life. The former are like an old lady lying sick in bed and a bone vented when digging a well. The latter is like a tortoise crawling hard on a dry cemetery and a fly pushing a dung ball.
"Gone with the Wind" is probably counted as a "private movie", just like the director's personal diary, there are many causes and consequences because the director himself is so familiar with the heart that he is too lazy to record them one by one. Of course, if you are a tireless semiotics lover, you can also interpret countless square meanings from countless details. Abbas is simply paranoid in details, showing the smallest things bit by bit, so that I completely postponed his thoughts during the viewing process, and had long since lost the idea of questioning the meaning. In fact, a big concept can conceal everything: life itself is meaningless, so why bother to care about in the specific life process?
Denying the importance of the existence of meaning does not make a person a nihilist. The appearance itself is sometimes much more important than the meaning behind the research. People are always dissatisfied after seeing the skin. They want to know what's underneath. After many twists and turns, they often don't want it because the skin underneath is bloody. So a piece of nonsense.
View more about The Wind Will Carry Us reviews
