In the many absurd coincidences full of black humor, the sadness and reality that slowly permeated, in the process of constant grasping, killing, and searching, mirrored the rules of contemporary workplace. Many people say that the male protagonist is like the dog in the film. I think there are some inappropriate actions. I think it should be a series of actions by the male protagonist to make his fate coincide with his process of catching, killing and finding dogs. The pure character corresponds to the dog. The man begged for the professor. He found the noisy dog and put it in a cabinet in the basement. The cleaner found it and killed it. The colleague who got the professor's degree through bribery and didn't know how to drink, was drunk by the dean and was hit by a car while vomiting at the subway station. But then the male owner discovered that the dog does not actually bark. So dramatic, in my interpretation, it seems to correspond. A dumb dog who didn't know how to bark, and a new professor who didn't know how to drink, had the same fate. They all died because of things they couldn't do. When the sun was just right, the aunt who dried the radishes on the balcony said that the radishes should be dried in the hot sun, but soon it started to rain and the clouds were overcast. The man grabbed the dog and planned to kill it on the balcony, but he finally left the sunny balcony and went to the cold and dark basement to shut down the dog. The contrasting relationship and the use of scenes here specifically highlight the personality of the characters. The male protagonist has never been able to get the degree of professor. No matter how concealed the appearance, it seems to be full of sunshine, but the heart is still like a depressed and despicable basement. Feng Junhao really understood the element of the basement. What kind of place is the basement, dark and damp, it is always the opposite of sunlight, and the shameful things happen in the basement. Dogs are shut down, dogs are killed and boiled, and the boilers killed because of disputes cannot be on the ground. The homeless man who lives on, among the parasites, the husband of the so-called "inferior man" of the housekeeper lives in a basement where there is no sunshine all day long. An inferior man like this cannot exist in the eyes of the male owner's family, Director The basement is used very cleverly, and inferior people like the male lead’s family also live in the basement, full of the so-called "smell" that the rich can keenly feel. The same is true in the movie "Kidnapping the Dog in Front". And when the male protagonist murdered the dog for the second time, it was an emotional outburst. He no longer chose the dark basement, but went straight, dressed in bright red clothes, and took the dog from the tall building in the sun. The binoculars in the hands of the hostess who was constantly watching him also fell from the upper floor at the same time, and both fell to the ground at the same time. It fell heavily on the emotions of the audience, but the loss of the dog this time was not the last straw that suppressed the male protagonist’s emotions. The last straw that overwhelmed the male protagonist was that his wife also brought back a dog. Finally, After Songjia’s dog was lost, the male protagonist’s previous accumulation of depression and collapse, and his wife’s unprovoked accusations, overflowed the entire screen. As the hammer flew out, the two in the glass were smashed. The personal figure heralds a sharper contradiction. The male protagonist’s resentment at work has been deprived of the professor’s degree because other people have bribed the dean. In fact, Zhi Songjia was bought by his wife with all the pension, and his wife’s emotions burst out here. The wife only eats walnuts every day. The 13,000 yuan pension received by retirement has always been used to prepare for the husband’s professor. I paid 300 yuan to buy the dog Songjia she always wanted to raise. It is extremely absurd and sad here. The divided emotions are opened up and healed, and finally crushed heavily. The previous wife’s seeming cold eyes were misunderstood by her husband, which greatly pulled the strength of this fragment. The impact displayed in the field of misunderstanding is unparalleled. The anger and lack of understanding that have been knocked to the extreme are frozen in the air at this moment, and the sudden thunder also knocks the barriers up. The second half of the film is like a farce. After the male protagonist loses Songjia, he desperately seeks out. The female protagonist says that he really loves this dog. As everyone knows, he is the one who killed the two dogs. The actor has also taken the old path of his colleagues, bribing the dean, drinking with the dean, and vomiting at the subway station. How ironic, the actor's persistent abandon and disdain has finally become his pedal. Does Yun really know that the male lead is the one who killed the dog? In my opinion, she knew it when the male lead was running, but the girl’s kindness was willing to cover up for the male lead, or Said that he was unwilling to accept the identity of the male lead. My eyes are about to explode and I can't write anymore. Let's add some changes tomorrow. To be honest, there are still many ideas that have not been written. The final outbreak was after Songjia lost the dog, the male protagonist’s previous accumulation of depression and collapse, in the wife’s unprovoked accusations, overflowed the entire screen, as the hammer flew out, the glass was smashed. The two figures indicate a sharper contradiction. The male protagonist’s resentment at work has been deprived of his professor’s degree because other people have bribed the dean at this moment, and it is implied in the previous film and in the words of the wife at this moment. I learned that Songjia was actually bought by his wife with all the pension, and his wife’s emotions burst out here. His wife only eats walnuts every day, and the 13,000 yuan pension received by retirement has been preparing for the husband’s professor. It’s just that Spent 300 yuan to buy the dog Songjia she always wanted to keep. It is extremely absurd and sad here. The divided emotions are opened up and healed, and finally crushed heavily. The previous wife’s seeming cold eyes were misunderstood by her husband, which greatly pulled the strength of this fragment. The impact displayed in the field of misunderstanding is unparalleled. The anger and lack of understanding that have been knocked to the extreme are frozen in the air at this moment, and the sudden thunder also knocks the barriers up. The second half of the film is like a farce. After the male protagonist loses Songjia, he desperately seeks out. The female protagonist says that he really loves this dog. As everyone knows, he is the one who killed the two dogs. The actor has also taken the old path of his colleagues, bribing the dean, drinking with the dean, and vomiting at the subway station. How ironic, the actor's persistent abandon and disdain has finally become his pedal. Does Yun really know that the male lead is the one who killed the dog? In my opinion, she knew it when the male lead was running, but the girl’s kindness was willing to cover up for the male lead, or Said that he was unwilling to accept the identity of the male lead. My eyes are about to explode and I can't write anymore. Let's add some changes tomorrow. To be honest, there are still many ideas that have not been written. The final outbreak was after Songjia lost the dog, the male protagonist’s previous accumulation of depression and collapse, in the wife’s unprovoked accusations, overflowed the entire screen, as the hammer flew out, the glass was smashed. The two figures indicate a sharper contradiction. The male protagonist’s resentment at work has been deprived of his professor’s degree because other people have bribed the dean at this moment, and it is implied in the previous film and in the words of the wife at this moment. I learned that Songjia was actually bought by his wife with all the pension, and his wife’s emotions burst out here. His wife only eats walnuts every day, and the 13,000 yuan pension received by retirement has been preparing for the husband’s professor. It’s just that Spent 300 yuan to buy the dog Songjia she always wanted to keep. It is extremely absurd and sad here. The divided emotions are opened up and healed, and finally crushed heavily. The previous wife’s seeming cold eyes were misunderstood by her husband, which greatly pulled the strength of this fragment. The impact displayed in the field of misunderstanding is unparalleled. The anger and lack of understanding that have been knocked to the extreme are frozen in the air at this moment, and the sudden thunder also knocks the barriers up. The second half of the film is like a farce. After the male protagonist loses Songjia, he desperately seeks out. The female protagonist says that he really loves this dog. As everyone knows, he is the one who killed the two dogs. The actor has also taken the old path of his colleagues, bribing the dean, drinking with the dean, and vomiting at the subway station. How ironic, the actor's persistent abandon and disdain has finally become his pedal. Does Yun really know that the male lead is the one who killed the dog? In my opinion, she knew it when the male lead was running, but the girl’s kindness was willing to cover up for the male lead, or Said that he was unwilling to accept the identity of the male lead. My eyes are about to explode and I can't write anymore. Let's add some changes tomorrow. To be honest, there are still many ideas that have not been written. Does Yun really know that the male lead is the one who killed the dog? In my opinion, she knew it when the male lead was running, but the girl’s kindness was willing to cover up for the male lead, or Said that he was unwilling to accept the identity of the male lead. My eyes are about to explode and I can't write anymore. Let's add some changes tomorrow. To be honest, there are still many ideas that have not been written. Does Yun really know that the male lead is the one who killed the dog? In my opinion, she knew it when the male lead was running, but the girl’s kindness was willing to cover up for the male lead, or Said that he was unwilling to accept the identity of the male lead. My eyes are about to explode and I can't write anymore. Let's add some changes tomorrow. To be honest, there are still many ideas that have not been written.
View more about Barking Dogs Never Bite reviews
