In fact, the story itself is very clichéd, it is nothing more than the Hollywood version of "Faust", and the ending is very big and reunion, like adding another cover to a cover. But the chubby look of Alec Baldwin, who played the leading role in Stone, and the innocent and horrified eyes when making mistakes still left a deep impression on me. I have a habit of watching movies. I pay more attention to the actress's mouth when she speaks, and to the male actor's eyes when she thinks. When you think of a certain movie, the first shot that appears is usually the protagonist’s mouth or eyes. I have the opportunity to discuss this in detail in the future.
The reason why Alec Baldwin is mentioned again is because I was completely drowsy at night, and I randomly found a movie titled "Country Girl" to pass the time. The first thing I fancy is the title of the film, the country folks, there is no way, when you see something related to the "countryside", it is easy to get excited, not to mention there are girls. The second is a one-sentence video introduction, which is related to books and editing, and the heroine wears a pair of glasses that are similar to mine. She looks gentle and pleasant. However, had it not been for Alec Baldwin to show up in time, I might have read the bedtime book in advance. Because the beginning of the story is quite tossing, Sara Michelle Gellar is holding a pencil and an eraser, and she is constantly changing and erasing. The letters are jumping and changing at a speed that challenges the endurance of her eyes, which makes her bored. , So I plan to catch a golden turtle so that I can turn from a veritable associate editor to a regular editor, so as to end the current life that is destructive once and for all.
So in accordance with the director's arrangement, the Golden Tortoise came on stage. To be honest, if it’s Tom Hanks, Tom Cruise, Will Smith, even Anthony Hopkins, and even if these four make up Fs, I’m determined to take it. Withdrawn, because I think such a clichéd role is too abrupt for them. But for Alec Baldwin, this role is not only unobtrusive, but also clichéd. This is a strange idea, almost prejudiced, but it is him who attracted me to watch the film. Although Sarah Michelle Gellar puts on tight black leather pants, it is pretty cool, but if she is like a little The lamb is usually lying in the arms of another man, I guess I will still closed the window. Alec Baldwin is not a Hollywood first-liner, but his acting skills are really superb. Although he has only seen two movies starring him, whether it is the unlucky young writer Stone in "The Shortcut to Happiness" or the film I was deeply impressed by Archie, the editor-in-chief of the big publishing house, whose middle and surface scenery is actually desolate in his heart.
When Archie stood outside the concert hall disappointed by her daughter’s release of pigeons, and Brett was late for some reason, and the two quarreled, Brett blamed Archie for not blaming himself for his failure as a failed father. Archie repeated desperately. With the words "failed father", he left sadly. This scene is very palpitating, especially for us men. There is another scene that is more bleak than this one. A few days after the Cold War, Brett got up again and bought sea prawns to reconcile with Archie, but saw another woman in Archie's house, and this woman actually regarded Brett as Archie's daughter. Angrily Brett walked to the bedroom, crying bitterly and questioning Archie who was the woman who had left. Archie was silent for a moment, and his tearful face suddenly appeared in the camera, and then he replied quite poetically, "My indulgence. "While people hate this man's turmoil, he can't help but feel sad.
This film finally completes the happy ending of the film at the expense of the happy ending of love, that is, the father is dead, the man is gone, the girl has grown up and matured, and can live without relying on men. I edited the manuscript with a pen, and dare to put on those tight black leather pants to pursue the beauty and happiness I want... It seems to be telling the story of a girl’s growth, and there should be some positive education for young girls who are new to society. Meaning, but what I see is another theme, a question about "man's care", especially the confusion and helplessness that men encounter when playing the role of father. Archie actually regarded Brett as another daughter to a large extent, and wanted to find in her a sense of security that his own daughter did not give him. Although Brett's father Robert was a father loved by his daughter on the surface, he was even enamored. Cancer didn't dare to tell his daughter because he was afraid of affecting her life. In fact, his daughter did not give him enough sense of security, and he was very worried. The two fathers, who are only a few years apart, are like brothers when they lie down on the sofa and doze together. In fact, they are really difficult brothers in the matter of being fathers.
Therefore, it is necessary to care about the growth of girls, but there is also a process in the process of growing from a boy to a father, and this process will continue forever, whether it is MD (my daughter) or MS (my son), it will be It is a serious problem that the role of the father needs to face. At the moment, all kinds of education are in the ascendant, and maybe there will be training to teach men how to be fathers in the future. It is possible that this kind of training is already available, but I hope that when I need this kind of training, the training project will be more scientific and practical. How to be a mother is much simpler, because women have this talent, which is where women are more advanced than men. Feminists should encourage women to give full play to this advantage, and maybe they can also influence men. After all , Men and women need to complement each other in order to create a more harmonious family life, rather than simply cultivating women into another kind of men. This point of view is left for discussion with the director of the film and other people who have different opinions.
Finally, I added a compliment to the translation of the Chinese film title that the director scolded and vulgar. The structure of the film is very delicate, and the whole film is divided into chapters according to the book mode, which fits the content of the story quite well. The details are also beautifully handled, and the symbols and hints used in many places are well expressed. We shouted "details determine success or failure" all day, and then look at the so-called blockbuster movies that we have produced by ourselves, which are simply a collection of small bugs. Translating a title is also perfunctory. The original name of the movie is "Suburban Girl". Even if I translate it by Google, it is also "Suburban Girl". There should still be a difference between the suburbs and the countryside. At least, I didn't see a trace in the movie. The scene of the countryside, translated into "Country Girl" is easy to misunderstand, but if it weren't for the word "countryside", maybe I would not have seen this film, which is a coincidence. However, translations like "Fishing for a Golden Turtle" have to remind people of the skin pain when "LOLITA" was translated into "A Pear Blossom Pressing Begonia". Catering to the public is not what you cater to. Remember, the masses are not prostitutes, so don't pretend to be prostitutes. That will only make people more disgusting.
View more about Suburban Girl reviews
