Paradise Cinema has cut 42 minutes, and after considering it for a long time, I still rejected the invitation of my friends to review it together, but I still regret it after I made the decision. But after watching Peter Rabbit, I feel that indeed I have already experienced my own Paradise Cinema.
It may be a bit exaggerated to say that, because it is really my personal pleasure. I never know how long ago, the matter of watching movies has become more and more instinctive and mechanized for me personally, especially in the highly materialized and involuted film industry, which is full of irony in this film. Yes, I also feel numb. But for 80 minutes of watching Peter Rabbit, I seem to have regained the fun and excitement of watching the movie itself. I laughed every moment and found the ease that I don’t know how long after a long absence.
Compared with the CH live-action cute pet movie Paddington 2 which is also the sequel to the predecessor, I think Peter Rabbit 2 is much better than it. Paddington Bear is exactly the kind of highly involved movie that Peter Rabbit satirized. The cute pet movie couldn't make any new ideas, so I started to use ism, mixing various Wes Anderson elements and Hugh Grant such a dramatic absurd tragedy, the effect is actually good, but the cold meal is naturally not so fragrant.
So has Peter Rabbit made a new world? In fact, there is no, but it has made a new set of deconstructive anti-typography. Of course you can say that you have seen the elements and stalking techniques here, but Peter Rabbit can make you smile happier than the original ones. I forgot where I read the sentence "The core of comedy lies in offense." Indeed, it lies in "anti". The last time I watched hilarious animation before was Lego Batman (yes, soul and coco are very insensitive to me). As a DC fan master fan for more than ten years, I saw the giant baby axle-mounted high cold being so explicit. The Batman that showed up made me carnival the most. Today, as the film industry is getting more and more desperate, everyone has reduced their heads to the so-called "forefront of creativity", but they have never thought that the development of cultural industry is often a closed loop. Looking back with a playful look, he found a lot of new things instead. (Unfortunately, Siber, who explained this point in the top player, failed to grasp the meaning of it.)
Peter Rabbit is considered a weak film in the Dragon Boat Festival. After all, it looks very low and young, and the audience is not that wide, but I really think that the more adult you are, the more you should take a good look at Peter Rabbit. First of all, Peter Rabbit is compared with other picture books, cartoons, and fairy tales that have been put on the screen. The significance of the original work to the movie, in addition to the appearance of the protagonist group, is just to appear as a picture book drawn by the heroine in this world. All the scripts are brand new, using the original characters to compose the most realistic story, but they are completely in line with the core and theme of the picture book. Sounds simple? Just look at the result of what Disney did next door to know how difficult it is to do it well. Kuila seems to be the same way, but the whitewashing of the devil's head has actually completely changed the original work, but Peter Rabbit has not. Just as the bunnies watch picture books with themselves as the protagonists in the movie, these characters are also overlooking our lives off the screen. In the most peaceful and relaxing way, Peter Rabbit seems to have only satirized the Hollywood trend of entertainment to death, but in fact, there are far more ridicules than this.
Can't sell hand-painted butterflies? Changed to Butterfly vs. Zombies to sell immediately. It's boring to only sell picture books, and hundreds of peripherals will be bundled together. The rabbit is too confined in the vegetable garden, and the rabbit looks good only if it goes to space. I don’t know if I’m ashamed after reading it.
Peter Rabbit smiled everywhere and slammed into the current era of pursuit of entertainment and traffic. Choosing Nico as the representative of the capitalist villain is simply appropriate. At the moment, isn't Nico the most pleasing and most suitable thing for appearance in American society? (Yes, stuff) The first time the male and female lead pretended to be a writer and a boxer when they met the villain, it is a display of the most thirsty side of the common man and woman for the leaping of class. Van Gogh is also eager to emerge in the salon. Not everyone will give up their shares like Yuan Longping. Even if he was once again treated as an artist and a hermit, in many cases capital is Liming's capital, and sacrificing some self seems insignificant. In the end, the male protagonist persuaded the female protagonist, besides he realized that she had deviated from the original intention, in fact, there was also acidity and low self-esteem. From the first part, the male protagonist has always set up to do nothing. In the end, he has never played against Nico in the boxing ring. He is about accepting such a life that he can’t hold back at all and a "successful man". In fact, his wife was quite afraid and flinched. This has revealed a lot of real helplessness, no one wants to live a life of gold coin bath, but how many people can really handle it? Faced with the influx of huge wealth that has never been seen before, my heart is guilty.
The paragraph in the middle of the quarrel between the two people was taken with a narration, which made me think it was a very good design. It took the weak literary play, but also satirized the true meaning of the couple's quarrel-"At the end of the quarrel, I have forgotten why the quarrel started. "
Regarding the rabbit line, it is true that the master took care of Dickens's terrier, and the entire animal version of the fog is orphaned. The old rabbit was deliberately caught, and the two small turns of the test of interrogating the pigs really gave me a lot of surprises. In the end, a wave of identity reversal after finishing the farmers' trade fair is expected, but it can also give people a lot of excitement. In the end, the protagonist went around to rescue animals and ridiculed various genres, and people who watched it can also smile knowingly. The two roles of the fox and the rooster are well-known and full of laughter, which is also very impressive. It's a pity that the rabbit line is packed with too many things, too messy, and too scattered, and many things are simple to taste. Although the smiles are very dense and dense and really make people look happy, there are a lot of places where it feels insufficient compared to the human line. First of all, after Peter was bound by the bad seed’s person, the matter was actually gone. Peter and the protagonist just smashed the protagonist’s tomatoes before the reconciliation. As a result, the protagonist could not only forgive him, but also his attitude. Reverse 180 degrees. At the beginning, Peter was so resistant to being his "daddy", but when everyone was arrested, he suddenly accepted it, and also very suddenly. And the last two story lines did not find a special core and unified emotional impact, which seems a pity. The most critical shortcoming Nico also said, other animals have no personality at all, many of them can't even reach the paper characters, maybe even the most basic character biographies are not written. This is particularly inappropriate in a "group portrait" drama.
However, the happiness that Peter Rabbit brought me was absolutely unprecedented. I would not rank such a film in my best film sequence (of course, if I list a live-action CG film alone), it will definitely be the future. The movies I often take out to watch, it allows me to regain the original pleasure of watching movies.
After the subtitles, I was sitting in the cinema for a long time and didn’t want to leave. I suddenly remembered that a sister told me that she watched the Lion King 1 in the cinema when she was a child. After watching it, she really liked it. At that time, she didn’t leave the scene manually, so she was in the cinema. Sit in the cinema without eating or drinking and watched the Lion King 7 times a day. I thought it was incredible at the time, and until now I have such an impulse. I turned on my phone and saw the Dragon Boat Festival movie viewing plan shared with my friends, tropical past, hello world, infinity, I have not watched it yet. I walked out of Peter Rabbit’s hall and returned to the state of the movie viewing machine.
But I am not so lost and numb, because I have watched Peter Rabbit, and I know that there is a film that I can always show when I am most exhausted and most negative. When I look at it, I get a self-revelry like a rabbit’s mouth is filled with rainbow candy. It is an unpleasant spiritual liberation that only I can play with.
View more about Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway reviews
