2001. Rookie lawyer Ryan (30 years old), acted as a defense lawyer for a suspect in a murder case. And the deceased Meyer (84 years old) was actually the grandfather of his friend's sister—a highly respected and honorable entrepreneur—of course, he was also his father, no, grandfather.
The sister-in-law in the UK-leaving her husband-returned home alone and inherited the family business. In order to get the murderer to be punished, the sister of the artillery friend took the initiative to find Ryan for a shot-well, Ryan is still obedient, very obedient.
In order to collect evidence, Ryan also took the initiative to find his friend's sister to have a shot-as he wished, he found the evidence.
Ryan found the motive for the murder and returned, intending to put a big cannon on the court. And this shot will ruin the deceased Meyer (84 years old), and it will also damage the corporate reputation of the friend's sister. So, in order to prevent Ryan from firing a cannon in the court, the sister-in-law of Paoyou replayed the trick again, and planned to kill her.
As a result, Ryan quit—he wanted to zoom in on the cannon in court, and couldn't set off a small cannon with his sister-in-law—the two of them didn't fight the gun and broke up.
In the end, Ryan finally shot the gun in the court-he said the motive for the murder:
Grandpa Meyer turned out to be a Nazi war criminal. In 1944, Meyer (27 years old) brutally killed Baba of suspect Corinne (when he was 10 years old).
In 1968, Corinne (at the age of 34) resorted to law, but the court acquitted Meyer (at the age of 51). In 2001, Colinni (67 years old) had to avenge his father by himself.
Is Corinne guilty or not? How does the court decide? This question is very confusing!
Finally, the court announced: the case was terminated. Because the suspect Corinne committed suicide in prison!
================================================== ============
It should be said that this ending is also considered perfect. But there was another section at the end of the movie, which I think was superfluous. No longer.
Overall feeling:
1. There are many revenge stories. However, few Nazi war criminals of World War II were targeted for revenge.
2. In fact, this cannot be regarded as a suspense film or a court debate. In fact, it should be regarded as an anti-war ethics film.
3. Many characters in it are redundant.
① Ryan's father doesn't need to appear at all-the reason why it exists is to let Colinny speak through the relationship between father and son; but even if there is no role of this father, it does not affect the unfolding of the story.
②The dead brother of Paoyou Sister can also be deleted-the reason why it exists is to allow Ryan to meet with Maien and Paoyou Sister-but why can't Meyer meet with Paoyou sister directly? It's totally okay?
③The takeaway girl seems to exist to serve as an interpreter for Ryan (I don’t know if you can do it, it’s not shown in the movie anyway)-in fact, Ryan can be set to understand Italian.
④Actually, the friends and sisters of the patrons do not need it. Deleting the subject matter of the film will not affect it at all.
Of course, if you remove all these characters, you may not be able to call it a movie. .
I think the movie is quite satisfactory. I gave it to Samsung. It turned out that there was no one star in the film reviews. So, here is a one-star look.
View more about The Collini Case reviews
