first part
The title I originally thought of was—faceless shots are the most terrifying. This "terrible" does not mean that the picture is terrible, but that I feel scared by thinking about the deep logic.
The actors’ acting skills are very good, especially the heroine, I won’t say that. I mainly want to talk about the faceless shots that are the most impressive.
one,
Watching the entire movie, you know that the opening paragraph and the ending paragraph are exactly the same. Did not show the expression of the heroine. But the first time I watched it and the second time I felt completely different.
For the first time, it was like an ordinary wife, caring for her husband and stepson.
The second time, there are too many meanings. First, the middle-class couples who seem to have raised their eyebrows do not actually have much affection. Second, she knew that her stepson insisted on a truth. Although she knew that there was no threat to her in the law, she was still worried about changes. Third, Peter has no expectations or trust in his son Gustav for going to the police station and "don't know" what happened. Fourth, the most terrifying point of contemplation. After seeing the second time, we realized that what we saw in the first time was only in reverse order-that is, when Gustav got home, he didn't enter the police station because of any crime. However, the audience labelled him as a bad boy for the first time.
I think of "The Devotion of Suspect X", the suspect used a short story to lay the first impression of other people and readers of himself. This impression usually exists in the subconscious, but it plays a key role. ——The screenwriter and director of this film clearly understand this and use it many times.
two,
A trunk shot when Guatav left is worth taking out alone. He was suspected of spreading rumors by his father and took the initiative to leave home. The upper eaves of the trunk glass blocked his face, and we couldn't see his expression.
It was rebellious to be forced to interrupt the relationship before, and he was calm when he confessed to his father. He was suspected of being angry by his father, and it was incredibly contemptuous to look at the hostess. However, he is really going to leave, he should be indifferent or disappointed? Or something else, anyway, without showing up, there is unlimited imagination, which is wonderful.
He patted the girls on the back, showing that he was also sentimental and paid. However, he will not miss this home anymore.
three,
At the end, the hostess's family went out, except for the expressionless profile face when the hostess locked the door, all other scenes were faceless.
The hostess braided hair for the girls—the girls are exquisite. Be carefully cultivated. But it looks like a doll. The whole film has such weird feelings. Maybe it wasn't to highlight them, but I really didn't feel the heroine's true feelings for her children.
Peter wears a tie-to go out, the most important thing is decent. Even though the son Gustav proved by death that he did not lie, the heroine is a wicked person. But Peter won't change anything. At most, I saw the heroine's hypocrisy and broke out once again, overwhelming the heroine physically.
The hostess wears-nothing can shake the old lady.
the second part
The logic of this film is incredibly smooth.
From the work of the heroine, it strengthens the impression that the heroine adheres to the "truth" and "justice" for the young people, and even uses the partner (third perspective) to advise her to remain rational. Let us be convinced that the heroine is a " People who are just" and have professional ethics.
In the case of being a partner, it can be seen that the heroine is even somewhat unable to control her sanity in order to defend the truth. But when she broke the law herself, what did we see? Some impressive still shots, it seems that the audience is watching a stage play. ——Actually, the heroine’s perspective is pitiful, sometimes playing in the water, sometimes hiding and seeking, in short, all the time when she is tempted by Gustav. At other times, including when things are revealed, or even when sex is taboo, the camera is calm.
The camera is calm, in fact, it shows that the heroine is also calm. She knows her good life and all advantages, and she knows her desires. So she did, she went to seduce, when she had sex, she was out of her body. She doesn't love this boy, she understands that she just needs freshness. Knowing that things might be revealed, although she was a little flustered, she had already taken countermeasures instinctively. Face-to-face with Peter, preemptively, actors and actresses are amazing. Negotiating with Gustav and pinching a minor to death.
Part Three (End)
I saw a perfect feminist practitioner. I saw a large-scale double standard site for legal workers. I saw a middle-class family. I saw a teenager who was lonely and ruined because of lack of parental company and no one to help him since he was a child. I originally watched it for an erotic movie with a novel plot. I don't know when it became the main story. The script is awesome, and the director is awesome.
View more about Queen of Hearts reviews