In sci-fi movies of the traversing category, whether the story can be told well is the key point. 2067 has many problems in this regard, especially the first sending of "SEND Ethan" and the first death of Ethan (the fat woman said to kill He, Jude was not there at the time), he didn't make it clear. Moreover, the entire traversal is set as a single universe, that is, the past and the future are unified. At this point, notice that Ethan did a few things in the end.
1. Send the plant back to 2067, 2. Send a "send" signal to the father, 3. Smash the conveyor (and 1 purpose).
The first one changed the world of the "male protagonist", and the second one was to ensure the normal progress of his dad's research, but the key question is, why did Ethan smash the machine? He can turn it off and send it back to 2067 or later. One year, why destroy the machine? In addition, after the male protagonist destroys the Cronic company, its receiving end machine should be easy to find (built earlier), either rebuilt or regarded as a relic. Why can it be seen that nothing has remained the same for 400 years?
There are still many details, but the brotherhood created in the first half of the plot is really comfortable, and then finally the conspiracy surfaced, I have to say that the plot design is great.
Although there are not many sci-fi images on the whole, it still does not affect my viewing. In the second half of the plot, especially after Ethan sees the bones, I have various conjectures. I only vaguely think that there is a problem with jude, but in the end about Ethan The plot setting itself is something I didn't expect.
In addition, this film has a strong humanistic atmosphere. The soundtrack is very suitable for the scene, especially the two long-distance shots and the soundtrack of the male protagonist standing by the waterfall. It is really shocking. In short, I didn’t fast forward in the process of basically watching it. The ending is also a bit tragic, but it still means an open ending (the male protagonist may be able to use future technology to go back), overall it is very good, it can give 3.5+.
View more about 2067 reviews
