Another related documentary appeared. The sexual assault case of gymnastics coach Larry Nassar described in this documentary has been heard of related reports a few years ago, but I don’t know the details of it. The similarity between the two cases is that Larry Naxal and Epstein are both typical beasts. Undoubtedly, they relied on their own convenience to extend their shameless demon to the ignorant underage girl. The former has a very high standard. The latter’s disguise is used to cover up his criminal behavior, and the victim of the latter is often limited by objective factors. The difference between Naxal and Epstein is that, because of his professional qualities, he can directly touch all parts of the girls' bodies in an open and honest manner, eliminating the secret and private places. If according to a normal person's perspective, his hands are only performing his job duties, if bystanders have to associate it with sex, the person who questioned it would be regarded as a dirty soul. What I want to say is whether the surname Na is a complete metamorphosis, or strayed into the magic way halfway and violated the basic personality bottom line. Since the clues are only one or two, there is no need for unreasonable guessing. It is mentioned in the film that he himself also has a complete family, his wife and children, and normal interpersonal communication in the society. Therefore, before the incident in Dongchuang, no one except the little girls who were victimized knew Nasser's true face. If any details of this matter are not exposed, and the outside world just guesses at most to the level of the so-called conspiracy theory, then whether I will judge and analyze Naxal’s views with my "rational" view of right and wrong in a scene without a preset What about behavior leading to darker and more negative conclusions? For example, the "little girls" who bravely stood up in the film, although they have grown up many years later, their memories and physical feelings when they were violated are still biting and tearing their wounded and mutilated souls in the depths of their hearts. Not to mention the suspicion and verbal criticism of them when the incident was revealed, and even more so that they were spitting out vicious and indecent words on the side of favor Naxal, as if they were afraid that the crimes they would suffer would come to an end. There are two sides to everything, right and wrong, black and white, this is the simplest and universally accepted value of the world, and its convenience and applicability are beyond doubt. In the same way, the views and opinions on things are divided into two, and the outsiders' perception is nothing but approval or disapproval. Some people think that Naxal is a scumbag and should be sentenced to imperial punishment, but another thinks that Naxal is wronged, he is innocent, but "framed" his many women because they are out of the sports world. The former star wanted to find some money to comfort him. Before the evidence is conclusive, any guesses and doubts should be understandable and acceptable. I I am also Zhuge Liang afterwards. After watching the documentary and related materials, plus my previous impressions of the incident, I can crusade and flog the surname Na as I wish. It is a pleasure. I am not qualified to say that before the disclosure of various information, I can more calmly analyze the original circumstances and appearance of the incident. Non-professional people generally only have the attributes of eating melons. It is inevitable to be led. It seems that we can only rely on it. The media agency or organization reporting the incident expects it to be able to perform its sacred mission objectively and impartially, impartially, completely neutral, and without any emotional color. But apart from wishful thinking, what we see is that on the increasingly developed media platforms, the audience’s venting of emotions is the kingly way, and the matter itself "Who cares.
After writing here for a few days, there are some thoughts in my mind that are produced by processing the information I have taken and viewed, but the basic level is still very chaotic, and the writing level is very limited, I am afraid that it will be browsed. 'S friend is at a loss. After the fog, I was thinking about a question, what made Naxal’s senior leaders so confident to cover this crime that has already happened and is still happening, and it is merely a business benefit? There is nothing wrong with the money itself, and the people who have the problem are often the people holding the ticket...
View more about Athlete A reviews