emmm... I feel that... the content of this film is a mess, which makes it a bit like being divided into two, telling two unrelated stories.
Story 1: The pious priest initially accused his colleagues and the housekeeper of personal affair, until he met true love in the bar, and the news of having sex with his lover in the car was exposed. He refused to say goodbye to the priest's priesthood and understood and supported each other with his colleagues. Publicly admit (but not understood by people)...
Story 2: A female junior high school student who was sexually assaulted by her father confessed to the priest, but because the priest did not allow the content of the confession, the priest could only stand by and wait for the girl’s mother to realize that the priest had been accused of committing a crime. The girl finally chose to understand the priest
emm... Whether it's using a father's sexual assault to set off the priest's principle, or using an ordinary man encountered in a bar to show the priest's forbidden love, it is both unpleasant! Looking at other people’s film reviews, I’m so lofty (confused), I never think that new themes that no one mentions should be ignorant. If the filming is not good, then it is trash in the final analysis! If the film is completely different, the meaning of its existence is not as sweet as a brainless one! Don't buy porcelain without diamonds, and don't grab the "first time" of a movie with the same subject matter that is truly capable and content!
View more about Priest reviews
