In order to slander this movie, some people raised up Luc Besson's one, saying that it was like missionary, "drowsy", but in fact, this one was really not missionary, and talked about a few details. First, when a hungry refugee is hungry. Fleeing to East Remy, she begged Jean to give her some food. She took out the bread without hesitation, and was scolded by her father and warned him, what if they are a mob? ! Later, the father and daughter reconciled, and the filming was very touching and tender. Second, at the Battle of Paris, when Joan watched her comrades suffer heavy casualties because of her decision-making, holding him up to the sky, crying, confessing and reproaching herself, were you moved by her compassionate heart? Third, as a clergyman, the mother in the film saw her holding a child and drove away an adult who was squeezed in front when she was making porridge. She said that she was the kindest girl she had ever seen. Attention! What the clergyman said was not that Joan of Arc was a "wonderful girl"... In Vauculer, Joan organized civil forces to build a city wall, mobilized everyone to do it on her own, and defended her homeland. She was for the country. , Or for God? Please think about it carefully, when the lives are overwhelmed, the soldiers are rampant, and the court is incompetent, who will save the people... The 14th to 15th century was the embryonic stage of the Renaissance. What Joan did, her motives were actually very simple, but because She has a firm will and makes her different from ordinary people... Many of these scenes in the movie, when the soldiers who guarded the city before got the plague, and Joan disguised herself to find out the situation late at night, the other party asked the "saint" to give She blessed that the moment Joan stretched out her hand, this man happily shed tears and died peacefully... Is this a manifestation of humanity or a manifestation of divinity? I think it is the embodiment of human nature, it is called "hospice care" today! This film embodies the humanistic spirit of Joan everywhere, her love for "people", including when the bishop is bitter, Joan does not show weakness, bluntly counterattack, you will be a disaster to hear, judge me, it is you The hell. The bishop wanted to save "her soul," but he didn't know that it was himself who needed to save the soul. When he thought that Jeanne was detrimental to his authority and that Jeanne seemed to shake the supremacy of the church, his vain and prejudice made His ugliness suddenly appeared. The scene in which he accused Joan of Arc in public with no evidence was proof. Everyone was embarrassed. After Joan died, the bishop was also extremely painful. He knelt on the ground and wept bitterly... …
In fact, Joan of Arc is like Che Guevara, who did not hesitate to reach out to the leper in the movie "Motor Diary". This is the embodiment of noble personality, the love of one "person" to another "person", this is art The spirit of the revival period, the awakening of "people", and positive materialism. On the contrary, if you look at Luc Besson’s book, you also boast of materialism, but you are entangled in divine enlightenment everywhere. The man in black is like a silly X mixed up in "Wonderful Flowers", with two layers of skin on his mouth, and vice versa. In the past, he always made sense. This is the real strong preaching! A large number of descriptions of inner activities show that Luc Besson’s "Joan of Arc" is the real missionary film. Whose message is it? Butalück Besson’s own way, for the sake of "humanity", forced "analysis of human nature", and even forced a psychoanalysis of Joan of Arc, which attracted a large number of film critics and followed him to "psychoanalysis". With all due respect, this is evil and not. Sensible! The real beauty is due to distance. Luc Besson’s whole film has a posture of "I know Joan of Arc too much", which is very similar to a six-year-old boy (pseudo-literary art). But in fact, it is inexplicable to say that Joan of Arc is just an ancient man far away from us, and he has to let the ancient man who has been in jail and has a basic personality to "self-redempt" something, it is simply inexplicable and self-talking . Modern people feel a lot of guilt in their hearts and need salvation. This person is you! You need to be redeemed yourself. A Joan of knowing and doing does not need to be redeemed. She is ordered from heaven, and the oracle guides her. She is saving her country! The noble morals without compassion for others are the people of today who have bad courtesy and music. The obsessive-compulsive disorder that insists the ancients to "same brain" with you is not only logically inconsistent with history, but it also reflects the evil side of some materialists and is repeated. Discussing the issue of miracles just reflects that a group of materialists are more superstitious than anyone else. In my daily life, I personally prefer to be friends with people with religious beliefs, although some of them also have the kind of falsehood that forces you to believe in religion. People, but more like Joan in the movie, a pious and kind-hearted good person, pay attention! This kind of devotion to one's own beliefs is not fanatical, on the contrary, the infinite obsession with instrumentality and application is actually superstitious in regard to science as a religion! For example, the novel "Angels and Demons" discusses this issue. In the tradition, among standard Christian believers, there are also many rational and wise people. Those who understand the history of Western philosophy understand that the earliest philosophical thinking comes from the theology of the church, including dialectics. What China currently lacks is truly humanistic and plain movies, not discussions about theism and atheism! When Westerners are photographing Mulan, is there anyone here who photographs the history of the Renaissance? ! Japan has played Joan of Arc's plays. Compared to Japan, I
The director of the film cleverly avoided the dispute between gods and gods. He asked Jean to tell Charlie, "I am not the saint of Lorraine", but the miracles did tell me to come here, and Jean told Charlie extremely frankly. How the people united around her to get things done, so Charlie said after some political weighing, "Maybe, God arranged this way", and then the two walked out of the secret room... OK! Excuse me, does the crown prince here believe in God or not? If you think this way, it means that you still don’t understand it. What I want to reflect here is not the debate about divine enlightenment, but Joan of Arc. As a "hero" with a firm will to save the country and the people, it was her action that gave Charlie. To revitalize the courage of France, what I'm talking about here is actually that Charlie has recovered from Joan the courage he should have as the king of a country, and he is no longer decadent. Similarly, there is the debate between Joan of Arc and the Duke of Nudivar (pragmatist), etc. It is very interesting and wise, far more than Luc Besson. In my opinion, Luc Besson's version is called "legendary", which is too strange. Up. This one is realistic
View more about Joan of Arc reviews
